J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 May;152(5):385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.09.027. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
The objective of this study was to compare dentists' perceptions of gloss values of composite specimens with increased levels and to identify the gloss value considered to be clinically acceptable.
Disk-shaped composite specimens were finished and polished 3 ways: metallurgically using silicon carbide papers and alumina paste, manually using Enhance finisher and PoGo polisher (EP) (Dentsply Sirona), and manually using Sof-Lex (SLex) disks (3M). Specimens were produced with surface gloss ranging from 0 through 100 gloss units (GU) in increments of approximately 10 GU as measured with a glossmeter. A GU of 0 was nonglossy, and a GU of 100 was perfectly glossy. Ten dentists evaluated the specimens, ranking them in order from low to high gloss and in 4 groups: low (dull or rough), medium (moderate gloss, clinically unacceptable), high (glossy, clinically acceptable), and superior gloss. The authors performed Spearman correlation analysis (α = 0.05).
For each finish and polish method, there was an excellent correlation between the machine-measured (actual) gloss ranks and the clinician-evaluated gloss ranks (r ≥ 0.95). There was no difference in perception of surface gloss of the composite when metallurgically polished (with silicon carbide papers and alumina paste) or polished with EP to the same GU. There was a slight difference in gloss perception when comparing the 2 different commercial polishing systems.
Ten dentists consistently perceived gloss of 40 through 50 GU as clinically acceptable. However, the composite was considered clinically acceptable at a lower gloss (40 GU) when polished with SLex disks than when polished with EP or metallurgically (50 GU).
Gloss values of 40 through 50 GU are considered to be clinically acceptable for resin composites.
本研究的目的是比较牙医对复合试件光泽度的感知,并确定被认为临床可接受的光泽值。
使用三种方法对圆盘状复合试件进行打磨和抛光:机械法(碳化硅砂纸和氧化铝糊剂)、手动法(Enhance 抛光机和 PoGo 抛光器[EP](登士柏西诺德))和手动法(Sof-Lex[SLex]片[3M])。使用光泽计测量,试件的表面光泽度范围为 0 至 100 光泽单位(GU),增量约为 10GU。GU 值为 0 表示无光泽,GU 值为 100 表示完全有光泽。10 名牙医对试件进行评估,根据光泽度从低到高对试件进行排序,并分为 4 组:低(哑光或粗糙)、中(中等光泽,临床不可接受)、高(光泽,临床可接受)和超高光泽。作者进行了 Spearman 相关性分析(α=0.05)。
对于每种打磨和抛光方法,机器测量(实际)光泽度等级与临床评估的光泽度等级之间均存在极好的相关性(r≥0.95)。机械打磨(碳化硅砂纸和氧化铝糊剂)或 EP 抛光至相同 GU 时,复合试件的表面光泽度感知没有差异。当比较两种不同的商业抛光系统时,光泽度感知略有差异。
10 名牙医一致认为 40 至 50GU 的光泽度是临床可接受的。然而,与 EP 或机械抛光(50GU)相比,使用 SLex 片抛光时,复合树脂的临床可接受光泽度较低(40GU)。
40 至 50GU 的光泽值被认为是临床可接受的树脂复合材料光泽值。