• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可接受的树脂复合材料和抛光系统的视觉光泽阈值。

Visually acceptable gloss threshold for resin composite and polishing systems.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 May;152(5):385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.09.027. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2020.09.027
PMID:33549304
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare dentists' perceptions of gloss values of composite specimens with increased levels and to identify the gloss value considered to be clinically acceptable.

METHODS

Disk-shaped composite specimens were finished and polished 3 ways: metallurgically using silicon carbide papers and alumina paste, manually using Enhance finisher and PoGo polisher (EP) (Dentsply Sirona), and manually using Sof-Lex (SLex) disks (3M). Specimens were produced with surface gloss ranging from 0 through 100 gloss units (GU) in increments of approximately 10 GU as measured with a glossmeter. A GU of 0 was nonglossy, and a GU of 100 was perfectly glossy. Ten dentists evaluated the specimens, ranking them in order from low to high gloss and in 4 groups: low (dull or rough), medium (moderate gloss, clinically unacceptable), high (glossy, clinically acceptable), and superior gloss. The authors performed Spearman correlation analysis (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

For each finish and polish method, there was an excellent correlation between the machine-measured (actual) gloss ranks and the clinician-evaluated gloss ranks (r ≥ 0.95). There was no difference in perception of surface gloss of the composite when metallurgically polished (with silicon carbide papers and alumina paste) or polished with EP to the same GU. There was a slight difference in gloss perception when comparing the 2 different commercial polishing systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten dentists consistently perceived gloss of 40 through 50 GU as clinically acceptable. However, the composite was considered clinically acceptable at a lower gloss (40 GU) when polished with SLex disks than when polished with EP or metallurgically (50 GU).

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Gloss values of 40 through 50 GU are considered to be clinically acceptable for resin composites.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较牙医对复合试件光泽度的感知,并确定被认为临床可接受的光泽值。

方法

使用三种方法对圆盘状复合试件进行打磨和抛光:机械法(碳化硅砂纸和氧化铝糊剂)、手动法(Enhance 抛光机和 PoGo 抛光器[EP](登士柏西诺德))和手动法(Sof-Lex[SLex]片[3M])。使用光泽计测量,试件的表面光泽度范围为 0 至 100 光泽单位(GU),增量约为 10GU。GU 值为 0 表示无光泽,GU 值为 100 表示完全有光泽。10 名牙医对试件进行评估,根据光泽度从低到高对试件进行排序,并分为 4 组:低(哑光或粗糙)、中(中等光泽,临床不可接受)、高(光泽,临床可接受)和超高光泽。作者进行了 Spearman 相关性分析(α=0.05)。

结果

对于每种打磨和抛光方法,机器测量(实际)光泽度等级与临床评估的光泽度等级之间均存在极好的相关性(r≥0.95)。机械打磨(碳化硅砂纸和氧化铝糊剂)或 EP 抛光至相同 GU 时,复合试件的表面光泽度感知没有差异。当比较两种不同的商业抛光系统时,光泽度感知略有差异。

结论

10 名牙医一致认为 40 至 50GU 的光泽度是临床可接受的。然而,与 EP 或机械抛光(50GU)相比,使用 SLex 片抛光时,复合树脂的临床可接受光泽度较低(40GU)。

临床意义

40 至 50GU 的光泽值被认为是临床可接受的树脂复合材料光泽值。

相似文献

1
Visually acceptable gloss threshold for resin composite and polishing systems.可接受的树脂复合材料和抛光系统的视觉光泽阈值。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 May;152(5):385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.09.027. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.不同抛光系统对各种树脂复合材料表面粗糙度和光泽度的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00104.x.
3
Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.修整和抛光程序对树脂基复合材料表面粗糙度、光泽度和颜色的影响。
Am J Dent. 2004 Aug;17(4):262-6.
4
Influence of a new polishing system on changes in gloss and surface roughness of resin composites after polishing and brushing.新抛光系统对抛光和刷洗后树脂复合材料光泽度和表面粗糙度变化的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2021 May 29;40(3):727-735. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-207. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Reduced-step composite polishing systems - a new gold standard?简化步骤复合抛光系统——新的金标准?
J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103769. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103769. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Flexural Properties and Polished Surface Characteristics of a Structural Colored Resin Composite.结构色树脂复合材料的弯曲性能及抛光表面特性。
Oper Dent. 2021 May 1;46(3):E117-E131. doi: 10.2341/20-154-L.
7
Surface Roughness and Gloss of Actual Composites as Polished With Different Polishing Systems.使用不同抛光系统抛光后的实际复合材料的表面粗糙度和光泽度。
Oper Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):418-29. doi: 10.2341/14-014L. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
8
Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites.抛光纳米填充和纳米混合树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度和光泽度。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Oct;16(4):1198-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.一步抛光系统对三种美学树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):203-11.
10
Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.使用不同系统抛光的可压实复合树脂的表面粗糙度。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):42-7; discussion 48. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00450.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Roughness and Gloss of 3D-Printed Crowns Following Polishing or Varnish Application.3D打印牙冠在抛光或涂覆清漆后的粗糙度和光泽度
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;18(14):3308. doi: 10.3390/ma18143308.
2
Impact of different polishing techniques on surface roughness, gloss, and microhardness of zirconium oxide reinforced flowable bulk-fill resin composite: an in vitro study.不同抛光技术对氧化锆增强可流动大块充填树脂复合材料表面粗糙度、光泽度和显微硬度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1257. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06605-y.
3
The effects of a carbonated beverage on the optical properties and microhardness of preheated bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
碳酸饮料对预热大块充填复合树脂修复体光学性能和显微硬度的影响。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Jun 2;6:1539527. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1539527. eCollection 2025.
4
Color Stability, Surface Gloss, Surface Roughness, and Wettability of Material Jetting 3D-Printed Denture Material Under Various Surface Treatments.不同表面处理下材料喷射3D打印义齿材料的颜色稳定性、表面光泽度、表面粗糙度和润湿性
Dent J (Basel). 2025 May 20;13(5):220. doi: 10.3390/dj13050220.
5
Can charcoal-based dentifrices change the color stability and roughness of bleached tooth enamel and resin composites?基于木炭的牙膏会改变漂白后的牙釉质和树脂复合材料的颜色稳定性及粗糙度吗?
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 Feb 1;17(2):e149-e159. doi: 10.4317/jced.62319. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Staining susceptibility and the effect of different stain removal techniques on the optical properties of injectable composite resins.可注射复合树脂的染色敏感性及不同污渍去除技术对其光学性能的影响。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Feb 28;6:1556155. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1556155. eCollection 2025.
7
Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites.不同抛光系统对单色调树脂复合材料表面粗糙度和光泽值的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):1391. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05163-z.
8
Effect of Finishing Protocol on Obtaining and Maintaining Gloss in Four Nanohybrid Resin Composites.修整方案对四种纳米复合树脂复合材料光泽度获取与保持的影响
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69073. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69073. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Can wheel polishers improve surface properties and color stability of monochromatic resin composites?轮毂抛光机能否改善单色树脂复合材料的表面性能和颜色稳定性?
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04971-7.
10
Surface treatment, liquid, and aging effects on color and surface properties of monolithic ceramics.表面处理、液体及老化对整体陶瓷颜色和表面性能的影响
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Jun;16(3):174-188. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.3.174. Epub 2024 Jun 25.