J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 May-Jun;61(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.12.027. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
Despite evidence-based Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations, outcomes are poor. GOLD uses chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) scores with exacerbation history to categorize COPD severity into A, B, C, and D severity groups. Therapy is group-specific; monotherapy/dual long-acting bronchodilators (LABDs) therapy is preferred to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Pharmacist-accessible data could be used to identify evidence-based interventions to improve outcomes. The primary objective was to analyze previously collected data to compare the consistency of patient-described COPD regimens with GOLD therapeutic recommendations to identify potential pharmacist interventions.
Cross-sectional, nonrandomized design using a written questionnaire and CAT scores. Dispensing data from 35 Missouri community pharmacies initially identified participants aged 40 years or older with 1 or more COPD medications dispensed in the past year. Those self-reporting COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis completed a demographic survey with medication history, including oral corticosteroid and antibiotic use, and CAT scores. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated for any COPD maintenance medication dispensed over 1 year. The participants' COPD was categorized into A, B, C, and D severity groups. The reported medication regimens were categorized into consistent with, escalated from, or less than initial first-line/alternative recommended therapy for the A, B, C, and D severity groups.
The participants totaled 709 (group A: 6%; group B: 35%; group C: 4%; group D: 55%). Of the regimens, 41% were consistent with, 34% were escalated from, and 24% were less than initial first-line/alternative GOLD recommendations. Most (96%) of the participants were highly symptomatic. Regimens containing ICS: (67.5%); ICS plus LABD (37.2%) exceeded dual LABD (4.2%). The average PDC was 0.43 ± 0.37; only 28.7% were adherent (PDC ≥ 0.80).
Participants with self-reported COPD were highly symptomatic and nonadherent; undertreatment was noted. Community pharmacists could provide therapeutic interventions consistent with GOLD A, B, C, and D severity groups, promote dual LABD versus ICS therapies, and optimize adherence.
尽管有基于循证的全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议 (GOLD) 的建议,但结果仍不理想。GOLD 使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD) 评估测试 (CAT) 评分和加重史将 COPD 严重程度分为 A、B、C 和 D 严重程度组。治疗是针对特定组别的;单药/长效支气管扩张剂 (LABD) 联合治疗优于吸入皮质类固醇 (ICS)。药剂师可获取的数据可用于确定改善结果的循证干预措施。主要目的是分析以前收集的数据,以比较患者描述的 COPD 方案与 GOLD 治疗建议的一致性,以确定潜在的药剂师干预措施。
使用书面问卷和 CAT 评分进行横断面、非随机设计。最初从 35 家密苏里州社区药店的配药数据中确定年龄在 40 岁或以上、过去一年中开有 1 种或多种 COPD 药物的参与者。那些自我报告患有 COPD、肺气肿或慢性支气管炎的人完成了一份包括用药史的人口统计学调查,包括口服皮质类固醇和抗生素的使用情况以及 CAT 评分。计算任何 COPD 维持药物在过去一年中的覆盖率 (PDC)。根据 GOLD 推荐的 A、B、C 和 D 严重程度组,将参与者的 COPD 分为 A、B、C 和 D 严重程度组。报告的药物方案分为与 A、B、C 和 D 严重程度组的初始一线/替代推荐治疗一致、从一线/替代治疗升级或低于一线/替代推荐治疗。
参与者总计 709 人(A 组:6%;B 组:35%;C 组:4%;D 组:55%)。在这些方案中,41%与初始一线/替代 GOLD 建议一致,34%从一线/替代治疗升级,24%低于初始一线/替代推荐。大多数(96%)参与者症状严重。含有 ICS 的方案:(67.5%);ICS 加 LABD(37.2%)超过了 LABD(4.2%)。平均 PDC 为 0.43±0.37;只有 28.7%的人依从性良好(PDC≥0.80)。
自我报告患有 COPD 的参与者症状严重且不依从;治疗不足。社区药剂师可以提供符合 GOLD A、B、C 和 D 严重程度组的治疗干预措施,促进 LABD 联合治疗而非 ICS 治疗,并优化依从性。