The North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
The North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Sep;74(9):2076-2084. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.048. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
Limb-threatening sarcomas invading major vessels present an oncological and reconstructive challenge. Curative resection involves either performing an amputation or an immediate reconstruction of the invaded vessels. We present our 15-year experience of these cases at the North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service.
A Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) compliant retrospective review of our prospective database was performed including patients who required major vessel reconstruction following sarcoma excision from 2003 until 2018. Patient demographic data along with tumour and histological subtypes, treatment modality, complications and outcomes were inquired. Autologous and prosthetic vessel reconstruction approaches were compared.
Nineteen patients were identified with the most common tumour locations being the thigh and groin areas. Five cases involved recurrent tumours. Clear resection margins were obtained in 15 cases. Autologous vein grafts were preferred over polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthesis in 17 cases. A pedicled flap or free flap was required to achieve adequate soft tissue cover in six patients, while the rest underwent primary closure. Five patients lost the patency of the reconstructed vessels with one of these requiring an amputation. The estimated disease-specific survival at 5 years was 58%.
Limb-preservation surgery in the context of vessel compromise is not only safe, but also a functionally and psychosocially beneficial means of avoiding an amputation. We believe that careful pre-operative planning and discussion in a multidisciplinary setting is key for obtaining positive outcomes.
侵犯主要血管的肢体威胁性肉瘤带来了肿瘤学和重建方面的挑战。根治性切除包括截肢或立即重建受侵犯的血管。我们介绍了在英格兰北部骨与软组织肿瘤服务中心的 15 年治疗经验。
我们对 2003 年至 2018 年期间因肉瘤切除后需要大血管重建的患者进行了前瞻性数据库的强化观察性研究报告质量(STROBE)符合的回顾性研究。询问了患者的人口统计学数据、肿瘤和组织学亚型、治疗方式、并发症和结局。比较了自体和假体血管重建方法。
共确定了 19 例患者,最常见的肿瘤部位是大腿和腹股沟区域。5 例为复发性肿瘤。15 例获得了明确的切缘。17 例病例中更倾向于使用自体静脉移植物,而不是聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)假体。6 例患者需要带蒂皮瓣或游离皮瓣来获得足够的软组织覆盖,其余患者则行一期闭合。5 例患者重建血管的通畅性丧失,其中 1 例需要截肢。5 年疾病特异性生存率为 58%。
在血管受损的情况下进行保肢手术不仅安全,而且是避免截肢的一种功能和心理社会有益的方法。我们相信,在多学科环境中进行仔细的术前规划和讨论是获得良好结果的关键。