Pneumology Service, Hospital Lucus Augusti, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo, Lugo, Spain.
Department of Allergy, University Hospital of Samanca, Salamanca, Spain.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2725-2731. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.033. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
There is a lack of tools to quantify the response to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) holistically in severe uncontrolled asthma patients.
To develop a valid score to assist specialists in this clinical context.
The score was developed in four subsequent phases: (1) elaboration of the theoretical model of the construct intended to be measured (response to mAbs); (2) definition and selection of items and measurement instruments by Delphi survey; (3) weight assignment of the selected items by multicriteria decision analysis using the Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of All Possible Alternatives methodology using the 1000minds software; and (4) face validity assessment of the obtained score.
Four core items, with different levels of response for each, were selected: severe exacerbations, oral corticosteroid use, symptoms (evaluated by Asthma Control Test), and bronchial obstruction (assessed by FEV percent predicted). Severe exacerbations and oral corticosteroid maintenance dose were weighted most heavily (38% each), followed by symptoms (13%) and FEV (11%). Higher scores in the weighted system indicate a better response and the range of responses runs from 0 (worsening) to 100 (best possible response). Face validity was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86).
The FEV, exacerbations, oral corticosteroids, symptoms score allows clinicians to quantify response in severe uncontrolled asthma patients who are being treated with mAbs.
目前缺乏一种工具来全面量化重症未控制哮喘患者对单克隆抗体(mAbs)的应答。
开发一种有效的评分系统,以帮助专家在这种临床环境下进行评估。
该评分系统分四个阶段进行开发:(1)阐述旨在衡量的结构的理论模型(对 mAbs 的应答);(2)通过德尔菲调查定义和选择项目和测量工具;(3)使用多标准决策分析(使用 1000minds 软件的所有可能替代方案的潜在所有成对排序法)对选定的项目进行权重赋值;(4)对获得的评分进行表面有效性评估。
选择了四个核心项目,每个项目都有不同的应答水平:严重加重、口服皮质类固醇的使用、症状(通过哮喘控制测试评估)和支气管阻塞(通过 FEV 百分比预测评估)。严重加重和口服皮质类固醇维持剂量的权重最重(各占 38%),其次是症状(占 13%)和 FEV(占 11%)。加权系统中的得分越高表示应答越好,应答范围从 0(恶化)到 100(最佳应答)。表面有效性很高(组内相关系数为 0.86)。
FEV、加重、口服皮质激素、症状评分可使临床医生量化正在接受 mAbs 治疗的重症未控制哮喘患者的应答情况。