Khalifa Andrew, Avraham Jacob B, Kramer Kristina Z, Bajani Francesco, Fu Chih Yuan, Pires-Menard Alexandra, Kaminsky Matthew, Bokhari Faran
Department of Trauma and Burn Surgery, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago IL, USA.
Department of Trauma and Burn Surgery, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago IL, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston IL, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
The endpoint of resuscitative interventions after traumatic injury resulting in cardiopulmonary arrest varies across institutions and even among providers. The purpose of this study was to examine survival characteristics in patients suffering torso trauma with no recorded vital signs (VS) in the emergency department (ED).
The National Trauma Data Bank was analyzed from 2007 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were patients with blunt and penetrating torso trauma without VS in the ED. Patients with head injuries, transfers from other hospitals, or those with missing values were excluded. The characteristics of survivors were evaluated, and statistical analyses performed.
A total of 24,191 torso trauma patients without VS were evaluated in the ED and 96.6% were declared dead upon arrival. There were 246 survivors (1%), and 73 (0.3%) were eventually discharged home. Of patients who responded to resuscitation (812), the survival rate was 30.3%. Injury severity score (ISS), penetrating mechanism (odds ratio [OR] 1.99), definitive chest (OR 1.59) and abdominal surgery (OR 1.49) were associated with improved survival. Discharge to home (or police custody) was associated with lower ISS (OR 0.975) and shorter ED time (OR 0.99).
Over a recent nine-year period in the United States, nearly 25,000 trauma patients were treated at trauma centers despite lack of VS. Of these patients, only 73 were discharged home. A trauma center would have to attempt over one hundred resuscitations of traumatic arrests to save one patient, confirming previous reports that highlight a grave prognosis. This creates a dilemma in treatment for front line workers and physicians with resource utilization and consideration of safety of exposure, particularly in the face of COVID-19.
创伤性损伤导致心肺骤停后复苏干预的终点在不同机构甚至不同医疗人员之间存在差异。本研究的目的是检查急诊科(ED)中无生命体征(VS)记录的躯干创伤患者的生存特征。
分析了2007年至2015年的国家创伤数据库。纳入标准为急诊科中钝性和穿透性躯干创伤且无生命体征的患者。排除有头部损伤、从其他医院转来或有缺失值的患者。评估了幸存者的特征并进行了统计分析。
急诊科共评估了24191例无生命体征的躯干创伤患者,96.6%的患者到达时被宣布死亡。有246名幸存者(1%),73名(0.3%)最终出院回家。在对复苏有反应的患者(812例)中,生存率为30.3%。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、穿透机制(优势比[OR]1.99)、确定性胸部手术(OR 1.59)和腹部手术(OR 1.49)与生存率提高相关。出院回家(或被警方拘留)与较低的ISS(OR 0.975)和较短的急诊科停留时间(OR 0.99)相关。
在美国最近的九年里,尽管缺乏生命体征,但仍有近25000名创伤患者在创伤中心接受治疗。在这些患者中,只有73名出院回家。创伤中心必须尝试对创伤性心脏骤停患者进行一百多次复苏才能挽救一名患者,这证实了之前强调预后严重的报告。这给一线工作人员和医生在资源利用以及考虑暴露安全性方面带来了治疗困境,尤其是在面对新冠疫情时。