Talucci R C, Shaikh K A, Schwab C W
Department of Surgery, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden.
Am Surg. 1988 Apr;54(4):185-7.
The charts of 1798 consecutive admissions at this level one trauma center to evaluate the practice of emergency airway control were reviewed. A total of 335 patients required endotracheal intubation, 320 oral endotracheal, 12 nasotracheal, and three surgical. A technique of rapid sequence induction (RSI) with oral endotracheal intubation was the method of airway control in 260 spontaneously breathing patients. Prior cervical spine evaluation was not obtained. In all instances airway control was prompt and accurate. There were no hemodynamic nor neurologic complications secondary to RSI or oral endotracheal intubation. It is believed that RSI with oral endotracheal intubation is a reasonable alternative to nasotracheal intubation in the spontaneously breathing patient.
回顾了该一级创伤中心1798例连续入院病例的图表,以评估紧急气道控制的实施情况。共有335例患者需要气管插管,其中320例经口气管插管,12例经鼻气管插管,3例手术插管。260例自主呼吸患者采用快速顺序诱导(RSI)经口气管插管技术进行气道控制。未进行颈椎评估。在所有病例中,气道控制迅速且准确。未发生因RSI或经口气管插管导致的血流动力学或神经系统并发症。据信,对于自主呼吸患者,RSI经口气管插管是经鼻气管插管的合理替代方法。