Evans Charity, Marrie Ruth Ann, Yao Shenzhen, Zhu Feng, Walld Randy, Tremlett Helen, Blackburn David, Kingwell Elaine
College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e043930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043930.
To determine whether better medication adherence in multiple sclerosis (MS) might be due to specialised disease-modifying drug (DMD) support programmes by: (1) establishing higher adherence in MS than in other chronic diseases and (2) determining if higher adherence is associated with patient-specific or treatment-specific factors.
Retrospective cohort study with data from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2015.
Population-based health administrative data from three Canadian provinces.
Individual cohorts were created using validated case definitions for MS, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease (PD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects were included if they received ≥1 dispensation for a disease-related drug between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2014.
Proportion of subjects with optimal adherence (≥80%) measured by the medication possession ratio 1 year after the index date (first dispensation of disease-related drug).
126 478 subjects were included in the primary analysis (MS, n=6271; epilepsy, n=55 739; PD, n=21 304; RA, n=43 164). Subjects with epilepsy (adjusted OR, aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45), PD (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63) or RA (aOR 0.26; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.35) were less likely to have optimal 1-year adherence compared with subjects with MS. Within the MS cohort, adherence was higher for DMD than for chronic-use non-MS medications, and no consistent patient-related predictors of adherence were observed across all four non-MS medication classes, including having optimal adherence to DMD.
Subjects with MS were significantly more likely to have optimal 1-year adherence than subjects with epilepsy, RA and PD, and optimal adherence appears related to treatment-specific factors rather than patient-related factors. This supports the hypothesis that higher adherence to the MS DMDs could be due to the specialised support programmes; these programmes may serve as a model for use in other chronic conditions.
通过以下方式确定多发性硬化症(MS)患者更好的药物依从性是否归因于专门的疾病修正药物(DMD)支持项目:(1)确定MS患者的依从性是否高于其他慢性病患者;(2)确定更高的依从性是否与患者特定因素或治疗特定因素相关。
回顾性队列研究,数据来源于1996年1月1日至2015年12月31日。
来自加拿大三个省份的基于人群的卫生管理数据。
使用经过验证的MS、癫痫、帕金森病(PD)和类风湿关节炎(RA)病例定义创建个体队列。如果受试者在1997年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间接受了≥1次与疾病相关药物的配药,则纳入研究。
在索引日期(首次配药与疾病相关药物)后1年,通过药物持有率测量的最佳依从性(≥80%)受试者比例。
126478名受试者纳入初步分析(MS,n = 6271;癫痫,n = 55739;PD,n = 21304;RA,n = 43164)。与MS患者相比,癫痫患者(调整后比值比,aOR 0.29;95%可信区间0.19至0.45)、PD患者(aOR 0.42;95%可信区间0.29至0.63)或RA患者(aOR 0.26;95%可信区间0.19至0.35)1年最佳依从性的可能性较小。在MS队列中,DMD的依从性高于长期使用的非MS药物,并且在所有四种非MS药物类别中均未观察到一致的与患者相关的依从性预测因素,包括对DMD有最佳依从性。
与癫痫、RA和PD患者相比,MS患者1年最佳依从性的可能性显著更高,并且最佳依从性似乎与治疗特定因素而非患者特定因素相关。这支持了以下假设,即对MS DMDs的更高依从性可能归因于专门的支持项目;这些项目可作为其他慢性病的应用模式。