• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护病房死亡的死亡率是否存在性别差异?系统文献综述方案。

Is there a sex difference in mortality rates for deaths occurring in paediatric intensive care units? Systematic literature review protocol.

作者信息

Almossawi Ofran, Friend Amanda, Palla Luigi, Feltbower Richard, De Stavola Bianca

机构信息

Department of Population, Policy and Practice, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK

Department of Paediatrics, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e046794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046794.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046794
PMID:33550270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7925908/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the general population, female children have been reported to have a survival advantage. For children admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), mortality has been reported to be lower in males despite the higher admission rates for males into intensive care. This apparent sex reversal in PICU mortality is not well studied. To address this, we propose to conduct a systematic literature review to summarise the available evidence. Our review will study the reported differences in mortality between males and females aged 0-17, who died in a PICU, to examine if there is a difference between the two sexes in PICU mortality, and if so, to describe the magnitude and direction of this difference.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Studies that directly or indirectly addressed the association between sex and mortality in children admitted to intensive care will be eligible for inclusion. Studies that directly address the association will be eligible for data extraction. The search strings were based on terms related to the population (children in intensive care), the exposure (sex) and the outcome (mortality). We used the databases MEDLINE (1946-2020), Embase (1980-2020) and Web of Science (1985-2020) as these cover relevant clinical publications. We will assess the reliability of included studies using the risk of bias in observational studies of exposures tool. We will consider a pooled effect if we have at least three studies with similar periods of follow up and adjustment variables.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review as it will synthesise data from existing studies. This manuscript is a part of a larger data linkage study, for which Ethical approval was granted. Dissemination will be via peer-reviewed journals and via public and patient groups.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020203009.

摘要

引言

据报道,在普通人群中,女童具有生存优势。对于入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童,尽管男性入住重症监护病房的比例较高,但据报道男性的死亡率较低。PICU死亡率中这种明显的性别逆转现象尚未得到充分研究。为解决这一问题,我们建议进行一项系统的文献综述,以总结现有证据。我们的综述将研究0至17岁在PICU死亡的男性和女性之间报告的死亡率差异,以检查PICU死亡率在两性之间是否存在差异,如果存在差异,则描述这种差异的大小和方向。

方法与分析

直接或间接涉及重症监护病房儿童性别与死亡率之间关联的研究将符合纳入条件。直接涉及该关联的研究将符合数据提取条件。检索词基于与人群(重症监护病房儿童)、暴露因素(性别)和结局(死亡率)相关的术语。我们使用了MEDLINE(1946 - 2020年)、Embase(1980 - 2020年)和Web of Science(1985 - 2020年)数据库,因为这些数据库涵盖了相关的临床出版物。我们将使用暴露因素观察性研究中的偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的可靠性。如果我们至少有三项随访期和调整变量相似的研究,我们将考虑合并效应。

伦理与传播

由于本综述将综合现有研究的数据,因此无需伦理批准。本手稿是一项更大的数据关联研究的一部分,该研究已获得伦理批准。传播将通过同行评审期刊以及公共和患者群体进行。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020203009。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e297/7925908/36f7050d2774/bmjopen-2020-046794f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e297/7925908/36f7050d2774/bmjopen-2020-046794f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e297/7925908/36f7050d2774/bmjopen-2020-046794f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Is there a sex difference in mortality rates for deaths occurring in paediatric intensive care units? Systematic literature review protocol.儿科重症监护病房死亡的死亡率是否存在性别差异?系统文献综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e046794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046794.
2
Is there a sex difference in mortality rates in paediatric intensive care units?: a systematic review.儿科重症监护病房的死亡率存在性别差异吗?:一项系统综述。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Oct 9;11:1225684. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1225684. eCollection 2023.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
[SENTIERI - Epidemiological Study of Residents in National Priority Contaminated Sites. Sixth Report].[国家重点污染场地居民流行病学研究。第六次报告]
Epidemiol Prev. 2023 Jan-Apr;47(1-2 Suppl 1):1-286. doi: 10.19191/EP23.1-2-S1.003.
5
Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and manage delirium in critically ill children in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units (NICU/PICU): a scoping review protocol.非药物干预措施预防和治疗新生儿和儿科重症监护病房(NICU/PICU)中危重症儿童谵妄的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 29;13(10):e073883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073883.
6
Protocol on a systematic review of nomenclature and outcomes in children with complex critical illness in Paediatric Critical Care: The basis for consensus definition.《儿科重症监护中复杂危重症患儿命名与结局系统评价协议:共识定义的基础》
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0318312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318312. eCollection 2025.
7
Assessment of Long-term Psychological Outcomes After Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿科重症监护病房入院后长期心理结局评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Mar 1;176(3):e215767. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5767. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
8
Nutritional support for critically ill children.危重症儿童的营养支持
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 27;2016(5):CD005144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005144.pub3.
9
Routine gastric residual volume measurement to guide enteral feeding in mechanically ventilated infants and children: the GASTRIC feasibility study.常规胃残余量测量指导机械通气婴儿和儿童的肠内喂养:GASTRIC 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(23):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta24230.
10
Evaluation of the role of sex as a prognostic factor in critically ill adults with sepsis: systematic review protocol.评估性别作为脓毒症成年危重症患者预后因素的作用:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 May 6;10(5):e035927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035927.

引用本文的文献

1
Is there a sex difference in mortality rates in paediatric intensive care units?: a systematic review.儿科重症监护病房的死亡率存在性别差异吗?:一项系统综述。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Oct 9;11:1225684. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1225684. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A study of sex difference in infant mortality in UK pediatric intensive care admissions over an 11-year period.一项研究表明,在英国儿科重症监护病房住院的婴儿中,11 年间存在性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01173-x.
2
The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures.观察性暴露研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-E)工具:在应用于观察性暴露研究时出现的问题。
Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 21;7(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0915-2.
3
Boys have better short-term and long-term survival rates after intensive care admissions than girls.
重症监护入院后,男孩的短期和长期生存率均高于女孩。
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Dec;106(12):1973-1978. doi: 10.1111/apa.14044. Epub 2017 Sep 17.
4
Children with life-limiting conditions in paediatric intensive care units: a national cohort, data linkage study.儿科重症监护病房中患有危及生命疾病的儿童:一项全国队列、数据链接研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jun;103(6):540-547. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312638. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
5
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.在EndNote中对系统评价的数据库搜索结果进行去重。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
7
Race/Ethnicity is not associated with mortality in the PICU.种族/民族与儿科重症监护病房的死亡率无关。
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):e588-97. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0394. Epub 2011 Feb 28.