Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guilan University of Medical Scieneces, Rasht, Iran.
Medical Biology Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):4884-4888. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1872062. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in clinical features and laboratory parameters in critically ill pregnant women with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared to moderate and severe pregnant women with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) but without ARDS.
This was a retrospective multicenter study of all pregnant women with COVID-19 diagnosed with ARDS between February 15, and May 1, 2020 in nine level III maternity centers in Iran (ARDS group). The control COVID-19 pregnant women were selected from 3 of 9 level III maternity centers between March 15 and April 20, 2020. Univariate statistics were used to look at differences between groups. Cluster dendrograms were used to look at the correlations between clinical and laboratory findings in the groups. A value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fifteen COVID-19 infected women with ARDS were compared to 29 COVID-19 positive and ARDS negative control (moderate: ( = 26) 89.7% and severe: ( = 3)10.3%). The mean maternal age (35.6 vs. 29.4 years; = .002) and diagnosis of chronic hypertension (20.0% vs. 0%, = .034) were significantly higher in the ARDS group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in their presenting symptoms. The ARDS group had a significantly higher prevalence of tachypnea (66.6% vs. 10.3%, = .042) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO) <93% (66.6% vs. 10.3%, = .004) at presentation. Relative lymphopenia (lymphocyte ratio < 10.5%, 66.6% vs. 17.2%, = .002), lymphocytes to leukocytes ratio (11.3% vs. 17.7%, = .010), and neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) >7.5 were significantly different between the two groups (all < .05).
Our data demonstrate that symptom-based strategies for identifying the critically ill pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 are insufficient; however, vital signs and laboratory data might be helpful to predict ARDS in critically ill COVID-19 pregnant patients.
本研究旨在评估与中度和重度伴有急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的 COVID-19 孕妇相比,患有急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的危重症孕妇的临床特征和实验室参数的差异。
这是一项回顾性多中心研究,纳入了 2020 年 2 月 15 日至 5 月 1 日期间伊朗 9 家三级产科中心诊断为 ARDS 的所有 COVID-19 孕妇(ARDS 组)。对照组 COVID-19 孕妇选自 2020 年 3 月 15 日至 4 月 20 日期间的 3 家三级产科中心。采用单变量统计方法比较组间差异。采用聚类树状图观察组间临床和实验室检查结果的相关性。P 值<0.05 认为有统计学意义。
将 15 例 COVID-19 感染并发 ARDS 的孕妇与 29 例 COVID-19 阳性且 ARDS 阴性的对照组(中度:( = 26)89.7%和重度:( = 3)10.3%)进行比较。ARDS 组的母亲年龄(35.6 岁比 29.4 岁; = .002)和慢性高血压诊断(20.0%比 0%; = .034)显著更高。两组在首发症状上无显著差异。ARDS 组呼吸急促的发生率(66.6%比 10.3%; = .042)和血氧饱和度(SpO)<93%(66.6%比 10.3%; = .004)的发生率显著更高。相对淋巴细胞减少症(淋巴细胞比例<10.5%,66.6%比 17.2%; = .002)、淋巴细胞与白细胞比值(11.3%比 17.7%; = .010)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)>7.5 在两组之间存在显著差异(均 < .05)。
我们的数据表明,基于症状的策略识别患有 SARS-CoV-2 的危重症孕妇是不够的;然而,生命体征和实验室数据可能有助于预测危重症 COVID-19 孕妇的 ARDS。