• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊患者的抗菌药物治疗服务的临床获益和成本。

Clinical benefits and costs of an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service.

机构信息

Robert Gordon University, School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, AB10 9GJ, UK.

College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct;17(10):1758-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.009
PMID:33551209
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The enrolment of patients to an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service can be a means of mitigating financial burdens related to the provision of care and optimisation of hospital bed management.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the clinical benefit of the Maltese OPAT service and to quantify the costs incurred to run it.

METHODS

The study period ran for 156 weeks during 1st October 2016 to 1st October 2019. Patient demographics, infection type, referring care team, antimicrobial agent/s used, type of vascular access device (VAD) available and service completion status (defined as provision of care without re-hospitalisation) were recorded. Time allocated for OPAT service delivery and expenses incurred were collected and an activity-based costing exercise was performed.

RESULTS

The patient population who benefited from the service was of 117, 15 of whom used the service twice, for a total of 132 episodes. Patients received 149 antimicrobial treatment courses, with ceftriaxone being the most common single agent used (n = 52, 34.9%). Teicoplanin with ertapenem was the most common regimen selected for combination therapy (n = 9, 52.9%). A total of 23 episodes (17.4%) resulted in a readmission, 6 (30%) of which were because of patient deterioration. The mean service running weekly cost was €455.47/$538.68 and a total of 3287 days of hospital stay were avoided. This effectively illustrates that the OPAT service optimised hospital bed availability without compromising care delivery.

CONCLUSION

The national OPAT service proved to be a safe and effective alternative for patient management to promote patient-centred care without hospitalisation.

摘要

背景

为门诊患者提供肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)服务可以减轻与提供治疗和优化医院床位管理相关的经济负担。

目的

本研究旨在确定马耳他 OPAT 服务的临床效益,并量化其运行成本。

方法

研究期间为 2016 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日的 156 周。记录患者人口统计学数据、感染类型、转诊护理团队、使用的抗菌药物/药物、可用的血管通路装置(VAD)类型以及服务完成情况(定义为无需再次住院即可提供治疗)。收集 OPAT 服务交付时间和费用,并进行基于活动的成本核算。

结果

受益于该服务的患者人群为 117 人,其中 15 人两次使用该服务,共计 132 例。患者接受了 149 次抗菌治疗疗程,其中头孢曲松是最常用的单一药物(n=52,34.9%)。替考拉宁联合厄他培南是联合治疗中最常用的方案(n=9,52.9%)。共有 23 例(17.4%)需要再次住院,其中 6 例(30%)是因为患者病情恶化。每周服务运行的平均成本为 455.47 欧元/538.68 美元,共避免了 3287 天的住院治疗。这有效地表明,OPAT 服务在不影响治疗的情况下优化了医院床位的可用性。

结论

国家 OPAT 服务已被证明是一种安全有效的患者管理替代方案,可促进以患者为中心的护理,而无需住院治疗。

相似文献

1
Clinical benefits and costs of an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service.门诊患者的抗菌药物治疗服务的临床获益和成本。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct;17(10):1758-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
2
Clinical efficacy, cost analysis and patient acceptability of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a decade of Sheffield (UK) OPAT service.门诊静脉用抗生素治疗 (OPAT) 的临床疗效、成本分析和患者接受度:谢菲尔德(英国)OPAT 服务十年来的经验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jan;51(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
3
Improving antimicrobial treatment in terms of antimicrobial stewardship and health costs by an OPAT service.通过门诊抗生素治疗服务提高抗菌药物管理和医疗成本方面的抗菌治疗效果。
Infection. 2024 Aug;52(4):1367-1376. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02194-0. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) versus inpatient care in the UK: a health economic assessment for six key diagnoses.英国的门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)与住院治疗:针对六个关键诊断的健康经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 28;11(9):e049733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049733.
5
Inequitable access to an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy service: linked cross-sectional study.门诊肠外抗菌治疗服务可及性的不公平:关联横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 1;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01261-w.
6
Costs of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) administered by Hospital at Home units in Spain.西班牙医院居家治疗单位管理的门诊患者肠外抗菌治疗的成本。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Jul;50(1):114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Efficacy and cost-effectivity analysis of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy unit in infectious disease clinical practices: Turkey perspective.门诊静脉用抗菌药物治疗在感染病临床实践中的疗效和成本效益分析:土耳其视角。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;75(6):e14147. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14147. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in the UK: findings from the BSAC National Outcomes Registry (2015-19).英国的门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT):英国抗菌化疗协会国家结局登记处(2015 - 2019年)的研究结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Apr 27;77(5):1481-1490. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac047.
9
Maximising the opportunity of a self-administration outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy pathway.最大化自我管理门诊静脉注射抗菌治疗途径的机会。
Br J Nurs. 2021 Jan 28;30(2):S4-S10. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.2.S4.
10
Impact of a multidisciplinary team review of potential outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy prior to discharge from an academic medical center.多学科团队对潜在门诊患者出院前接受静脉用抗菌药物治疗的方案评估对出院后抗菌药物使用的影响:来自一家学术医疗中心的回顾性研究
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Nov;45(11):1329-37. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q240. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Current practices in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programmes: an international multi-centre survey.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗方案的当前实践:一项国际多中心调查。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 May 27;7(3):dlaf075. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf075. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) across the world: a comparative analysis-what lessons can we learn?全球门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT):一项比较分析——我们能学到什么经验教训?
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Jul 19;6(4):dlae111. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae111. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Stability Studies of Antipseudomonal Beta Lactam Agents for Outpatient Therapy.
用于门诊治疗的抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物的稳定性研究
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Nov 30;15(12):2705. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122705.
4
Stability Study of Fosfomycin in Elastomeric Pumps at 4 °C and 34 °C: Technical Bases for a Continuous Infusion Use for Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy.磷霉素在4°C和34°C弹性泵中的稳定性研究:门诊肠外抗生素治疗持续输注使用的技术基础。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Sep 19;15(9):2347. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092347.
5
Stability of Ampicillin plus Ceftriaxone Combined in Elastomeric Infusion Devices for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.氨苄西林加头孢曲松在弹性输液装置中联合用于门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的稳定性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 22;12(3):432. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030432.
6
Evaluate the Effectiveness of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Program in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.评估沙特阿拉伯门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)项目的有效性:一项回顾性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;11(4):441. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040441.
7
Stability of Antimicrobials in Elastomeric Pumps: A Systematic Review.弹性泵中抗菌剂的稳定性:一项系统综述。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;11(1):45. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010045.