White Matt A, Campione Nicolás E
Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Palaeontology, Australian Age of Dinosaurs Museum of Natural History, Winton, QLD, Australia.
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 19;9:e10545. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10545. eCollection 2021.
Classifying isolated vertebrate bones to a high level of taxonomic precision can be difficult. Many of Australia's Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrate fossil-bearing deposits, for example, produce large numbers of isolated bones and very few associated or articulated skeletons. Identifying these often fragmentary remains beyond high-level taxonomic ranks, such as Ornithopoda or Theropoda, is difficult and those classified to lower taxonomic levels are often debated. The ever-increasing accessibility to 3D-based comparative techniques has allowed palaeontologists to undertake a variety of shape analyses, such as geometric morphometrics, that although powerful and often ideal, require the recognition of diagnostic landmarks and the generation of sufficiently large data sets to detect clusters and accurately describe major components of morphological variation. As a result, such approaches are often outside the scope of basic palaeontological research that aims to simply identify fragmentary specimens. Herein we present a workflow in which pairwise comparisons between fragmentary fossils and better known exemplars are digitally achieved through three-dimensional mapping of their surface profiles and the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. To showcase this methodology, we compared a fragmentary theropod ungual (NMV P186153) from Victoria, Australia, identified as a neovenatorid, with the manual unguals of the megaraptoran (AODF604). We discovered that NMV P186153 was a near identical match to AODF604 manual ungual II-3, differing only in size, which, given their 10-15Ma age difference, suggests stasis in megaraptoran ungual morphology throughout this interval. Although useful, our approach is not free of subjectivity; care must be taken to eliminate the effects of broken and incomplete surfaces and identify the human errors incurred during scaling, such as through replication. Nevertheless, this approach will help to evaluate and identify fragmentary remains, adding a quantitative perspective to an otherwise qualitative endeavour.
将孤立的脊椎动物骨骼精确分类到较高的分类学精度可能很困难。例如,澳大利亚许多白垩纪陆地脊椎动物化石-bearing矿床,会产出大量孤立的骨骼,而相关或关节相连的骨骼却很少。将这些通常支离破碎的遗骸鉴定到高于科级分类等级,如鸟脚亚目或兽脚亚目,是困难的,而那些被分类到较低分类等级的遗骸常常存在争议。基于3D的比较技术的可及性不断提高,使得古生物学家能够进行各种形状分析,如几何形态计量学,尽管这种方法功能强大且常常很理想,但需要识别诊断性地标并生成足够大的数据集,以检测聚类并准确描述形态变异的主要组成部分。因此,这种方法通常超出了旨在简单识别破碎标本的基础古生物学研究的范围。在此,我们展示了一种工作流程,其中通过对破碎化石和更知名标本的表面轮廓进行三维映射以及迭代最近点(ICP)算法,以数字方式实现它们之间的成对比较。为了展示这种方法,我们将来自澳大利亚维多利亚州的一块破碎的兽脚亚目爪骨(NMV P186153),鉴定为新猎龙科,与巨盗龙类(AODF604)的手部爪骨进行了比较。我们发现NMV P186153与AODF604的手部爪骨II - 3几乎完全匹配,只是尺寸不同,考虑到它们10 - 15Ma的年龄差异,这表明在整个这段时间里巨盗龙类爪骨形态处于停滞状态。尽管我们的方法很有用,但并非没有主观性;必须小心消除破碎和不完整表面的影响,并识别缩放过程中产生的人为误差,例如通过复制。然而,这种方法将有助于评估和识别破碎的遗骸,为原本定性的工作增添定量视角。