Laney Jesse A, Hallman Tyler A, Curtis Jenna R, Robinson W Douglas
Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 21;9:e10713. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10713. eCollection 2021.
Birdwatching is a rapidly growing pastime, increasingly involving the pursuit of rare birds as birders build lists of species they encounter. We expected reports of rare bird discoveries to quickly draw birders to locations, and that the increased attention at those locations would decay over time. We hypothesized that magnitude of draw and rates of decay would vary depending on characteristics of the species and the geographic locations where rarities were discovered. Discoveries of additional rarities might affect both the draw and decay, so we also quantified empirical evidence for the (PPTE), a social feedback loop where rarity discoveries are presumed to lead to additional rarity discoveries because of the elevated levels of birder activity once an initial rarity is reported. Although commonly invoked, supporting evidence for the PPTE hypothesis is anecdotal. We used 10 years of eBird data (2008-2017) in the United States to (1) understand birding activity when rarities were reported and the factors associated with draw and decay, and (2) assess the frequency at which initial rarity discoveries lead to reports of additional rarities. Across 273 rarity events, birder effort, as indexed by numbers of eBird checklists, increased above the pre-event baseline level, with the magnitude of draw varying geographically. We found no indication that draw was influenced by species identity or rarity-level, but latitude and distance to small airport proved important in drawing additional eBirders to rare bird discoveries. Mean draw of rarities and mean number of checklists from the same locations prior to each rarity discovery grew through the ten years, suggesting an increased influence of eBird on birder behavior in general. Decay rates in birder effort were more gradual in rare bird events with longer durations. Effort declined below baseline-levels after rarities went undetected, suggesting, "location-fatigue" following rarity events. Results did not support the PPTE hypothesis. Controlling for site-specific circumstances, birders had no better chance of finding additional rarities during events than at times outside events. Our results emphasize that eBird checklist quantity at rarity events follows a predictable but variable pattern of draw and decay influenced by location and time since rarity discovery; that birders have statistically similar chances of finding rarities during normal "baseline" birding activities as they do when known rarities are present; and that eBird represents a largely untapped resource for studying factors that influence levels of birding activity.
观鸟是一种迅速发展的消遣活动,随着观鸟者积累他们所遇到的鸟类物种清单,越来越多地涉及对珍稀鸟类的追寻。我们预计珍稀鸟类发现的报告能迅速吸引观鸟者前往相关地点,而且这些地点关注度的增加会随着时间推移而衰减。我们假设吸引程度和衰减速率会因物种特征以及发现珍稀鸟类的地理位置而异。额外珍稀鸟类的发现可能会影响吸引程度和衰减情况,所以我们还对推定的正反馈效应(PPTE)的实证证据进行了量化,这是一种社会反馈循环,即一旦报告了初始的珍稀鸟类,由于观鸟者活动水平提高,珍稀鸟类的发现被认为会导致更多珍稀鸟类的发现。尽管PPTE假设经常被提及,但支持它的证据多为轶事性的说法。我们使用了美国10年(2008 - 2017年)的eBird数据来(1)了解报告珍稀鸟类时的观鸟活动以及与吸引和衰减相关的因素,(2)评估初始珍稀鸟类发现导致更多珍稀鸟类报告的频率。在273次珍稀事件中,以eBird清单数量为指标的观鸟者努力程度在事件发生后高于事件前的基线水平,吸引程度在地理上存在差异。我们没有发现吸引程度受物种身份或珍稀程度影响的迹象,但纬度和到小型机场的距离在吸引更多eBird观鸟者前往珍稀鸟类发现地点方面被证明很重要。在这十年间,每次珍稀鸟类发现之前同一地点的珍稀鸟类平均吸引程度和清单平均数量都有所增加,这表明总体而言eBird对观鸟者行为的影响在增强。在持续时间较长的珍稀鸟类事件中,观鸟者努力程度的衰减速率更为平缓。在珍稀鸟类未被发现后,努力程度降至基线水平以下,这表明珍稀事件后存在“地点疲劳”现象。结果不支持PPTE假设。在控制特定地点情况后,观鸟者在事件期间发现更多珍稀鸟类的机会并不比事件之外的时间更好。我们的结果强调,珍稀事件中eBird清单数量遵循一种可预测但因地点和自珍稀鸟类发现后的时间而异的吸引和衰减模式;观鸟者在正常“基线”观鸟活动中发现珍稀鸟类的统计概率与已知有珍稀鸟类存在时相同;而且eBird是研究影响观鸟活动水平因素的一个很大程度上未被开发的资源。