Suppr超能文献

观鸟者的动机和专业化程度与参与不同复杂程度的公民科学项目的关联有所不同。

Motivations and Specialization of Birders Are Differently Related to Engagement in Citizen Science Projects of Different Complexity.

作者信息

Randler Christoph

机构信息

Department of Biology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 24, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 16;12(10):395. doi: 10.3390/bs12100395.

Abstract

Citizen Science (CS) projects are an important aspect of scientific data collection and biodiversity conservation. In ornithology, various CS projects exist, and even laypersons can contribute, but advanced birdwatchers also spend considerable time and effort in data collection. Here, different CS projects for birders were analyzed and compared with respect to recreation specialization and motivations for birdwatching. Established, psychometrically valid, and reliable scales were applied in this study. N = 2856 respondents from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland were grouped into no, low, and sustained engagement clusters. Sustained engagement was related to more complex programs, such as the breeding bird census and waterfowl counting. When comparing the engagement clusters, effect sizes were considerable, ranging from 0.098 (attraction) to 0.306 (skill/knowledge). Thus, birders of the three engagement clusters differed significantly in birding specialization, especially skill/knowledge, psychological commitment, social motivations, and the psychological construct centrality to lifestyle. No differences were found in enjoyment and achievement motivations. In conclusion, low-threshold projects are needed to attract participants, but keeping people within programs or moving them to a higher level of engagement might be easier when social dimensions are addressed.

摘要

公民科学(CS)项目是科学数据收集和生物多样性保护的一个重要方面。在鸟类学领域,存在各种公民科学项目,即使是外行也能参与其中,不过资深观鸟者在数据收集方面也投入了大量时间和精力。在此,对面向观鸟者的不同公民科学项目进行了分析,并就娱乐专业化程度和观鸟动机进行了比较。本研究采用了既定的、心理测量学上有效且可靠的量表。来自奥地利、德国和瑞士的2856名受访者被分为无参与、低参与和持续参与三组。持续参与与更复杂的项目相关,如繁殖鸟类普查和水禽计数。在比较各参与组时,效应量相当可观,范围从0.098(吸引力)到0.306(技能/知识)。因此,这三个参与组的观鸟者在观鸟专业化程度上存在显著差异,尤其是在技能/知识、心理投入、社会动机以及生活方式的心理建构中心性方面。在享受和成就动机方面未发现差异。总之,需要低门槛项目来吸引参与者,但如果关注社会层面,让人们留在项目中或促使他们提高参与度可能会更容易。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05a7/9598701/54c9410245be/behavsci-12-00395-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验