Yuan Wei, Chua Ivan Tjun Huat
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
JSES Int. 2020 Nov 27;5(1):56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.09.014. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Whether an anterior shoulder fracture dislocation should be reduced under sedation in the emergency department is still a dilemma. This retrospective study aimed to determine when it is safe to perform a closed reduction based on the fracture pattern.
Surgically treated anterior shoulder fracture dislocations over eight years were classified into three groups. Group 1 involved an isolated greater tuberosity fracture. Group 2 and 3 involved surgical and or anatomical neck fractures. In group 2, the head and the shaft fragments were displaced together anteriorly and inferiorly; whereas in group 3, the head was displaced and locked under the glenoid, but the shaft migrated superiorly. The outcome and complications of closed reduction were reviewed.
Twenty-nine patients with 30 surgically treated anterior shoulder fracture dislocations were reviewed. These included twelve patients (thirteen shoulders) in group 1, six patients in group 2, and eleven patients in group 3. Closed reduction was attempted in twelve shoulders in group 1, five shoulders in group 2, and six shoulders in group 3. Eleven group 1, four group 2, and none group 3 dislocations were successfully reduced. The patient who failed reduction in group 1 sustained an iatrogenic anatomical neck fracture. One patient failed reduction in group 2. His surgical neck fracture was displaced further after manipulation. No other complications occurred after closed manipulation.
Closed reduction under sedation is usually successful and safe for group 1 injuries with an iatrogenic complication rate of only 8.3% (1/12) in our series. It should also be considered for group 2 injuries as 80% (4/5) were successfully reduced. However, further displacement from the reduction maneuver may warrant an urgent open reduction. Closed reduction is futile for group 3 injuries. We recommend an acute management algorithm based on our results.
急诊室中前肩关节骨折脱位是否应在镇静下进行复位仍是一个难题。这项回顾性研究旨在根据骨折类型确定何时进行闭合复位是安全的。
对八年来接受手术治疗的前肩关节骨折脱位患者分为三组。第一组为单纯大结节骨折。第二组和第三组涉及手术颈和/或解剖颈骨折。在第二组中,肱骨头和骨干骨折块一起向前下方移位;而在第三组中,肱骨头移位并锁定在肩胛盂下方,但骨干向上移位。回顾了闭合复位的结果和并发症。
对29例接受手术治疗的30例前肩关节骨折脱位患者进行了回顾。其中第一组12例患者(13个肩关节),第二组6例患者,第三组11例患者。第一组12个肩关节、第二组5个肩关节和第三组6个肩关节尝试进行闭合复位。第一组11例、第二组4例脱位成功复位,第三组无一例成功复位。第一组复位失败的患者发生了医源性解剖颈骨折。第二组有1例患者复位失败。手法操作后其手术颈骨折移位更明显。闭合手法操作后未发生其他并发症。
对于第一组损伤,镇静下闭合复位通常是成功且安全的,在我们的系列研究中,医源性并发症发生率仅为8.3%(1/12)。对于第二组损伤也应考虑进行闭合复位,因为80%(4/5)的患者成功复位。然而,复位操作导致的进一步移位可能需要紧急切开复位。对于第三组损伤,闭合复位是无效的。我们根据研究结果推荐一种急性处理方案。