Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Neurooncol. 2021 Apr;152(2):339-346. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03705-x. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
The postoperative seizure freedom represents an important secondary outcome measure in glioblastoma surgery. Recently, supra-total glioblastoma resection in terms of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) has gained growing attention with regard to superior long-term disease control for temporal-located glioblastoma compared to conventional gross-total resections (GTR). However, the impact of ATL on seizure outcome in these patients is unknown. We therefore analyzed ATL and GTR as differing extents of resection in regard of postoperative seizure control in patients with temporal glioblastoma and preoperative symptomatic seizures.
Between 2012 and 2018, 33 patients with preoperative seizures underwent GTR or ATL for temporal glioblastoma at the authors' institution. Seizure outcome was assessed postoperatively and 6 months after tumor resection according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification and stratified into favorable (ILAE class 1) versus unfavorable (ILAE class 2-6).
Overall, 23 out of 33 patients (70%) with preoperative seizures achieved favorable seizure outcome following resection of temporal located glioblastoma. For the ATL group, postoperative seizure freedom was present in 13 out of 13 patients (100%). In comparison, respective rates for the GTR group were 10 out of 20 patients (50%) (p = 0.002; OR 27; 95% CI 1.4-515.9).
ATL in terms of a supra-total resection strategy was associated with superior favorable seizure outcome following temporal glioblastoma resection compared to GTR. Regarding above mentioned survival benefit following ATL compared to GTR, ATL as an aggressive supra-total resection regime might constitute the surgical modality of choice for temporal-located glioblastoma.
术后无癫痫发作是胶质母细胞瘤手术的一个重要次要结果指标。最近,与传统的大体全切除(GTR)相比,前颞叶切除术(ATL)作为一种超全切除方法,在颞叶部位的胶质母细胞瘤中具有更好的长期疾病控制效果,从而引起了人们越来越多的关注。然而,对于这些患者,ATL 对癫痫发作结果的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们分析了 ATL 和 GTR 作为不同程度的切除方法,以评估术前有症状性癫痫发作的颞叶胶质母细胞瘤患者的术后癫痫控制情况。
2012 年至 2018 年间,作者所在机构对 33 例术前有癫痫发作的患者进行了 GTR 或 ATL 治疗颞叶胶质母细胞瘤。术后根据国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)分类标准,在术后和肿瘤切除后 6 个月评估癫痫发作结果,并分为有利(ILAE 1 级)和不利(ILAE 2-6 级)。
总的来说,33 例术前有癫痫发作的患者中,23 例(70%)在切除颞叶胶质母细胞瘤后癫痫发作结果良好。在 ATL 组中,术后无癫痫发作的患者有 13 例(100%)。相比之下,GTR 组的相应比率为 20 例中有 10 例(50%)(p=0.002;OR 27;95%CI 1.4-515.9)。
与 GTR 相比,超全切除策略下的 ATL 与颞叶胶质母细胞瘤切除术后更好的有利癫痫发作结果相关。考虑到 ATL 与 GTR 相比在生存方面的优势,ATL 作为一种激进的超全切除方法,可能成为颞叶胶质母细胞瘤的首选手术方式。