The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador.
作者信息
Sisa Ivan, Mena Belen, Teran Enrique
机构信息
Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
出版信息
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Mar;21(1):3-6. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12307. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador.特设伦理评估委员会的负面影响：以厄瓜多尔与新冠疫情相关的研究为例。
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Mar;21(1):3-6. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12307. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
2
Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.发展中国家研究的伦理监督。
IRB. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):1-10.
3
In response to "The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador".回应《伦理评估特设委员会的负面影响：以厄瓜多尔与新冠疫情相关研究为例》
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Sep;21(3):100-101. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12326. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.对人体医学研究进行审查时反复出现的问题。
Albany Law J Sci Technol. 1991;1:1-33.
5
Status of ethical review and challenges in India.印度伦理审查的现状与挑战
Indian Pediatr. 2005 Dec;42(12):1189-90.
6
7
The need to understand IRB deliberations.理解机构审查委员会审议情况的必要性。
IRB. 2006 Jan-Feb;28(1):1-5.
8
Accreditation and certification for human research protection programs.人类研究保护计划的认证与认可。
Hum Res Rep. 2001 Nov;16(11):1-2.
9
Professional responsibility and the protection of human subjects of research in Canada.加拿大的职业责任与研究中人类受试者的保护
Health Law Rev. 2005;13(2-3):80-5.
引用本文的文献
1
The state of cancer research and its association with the cancer burden in Ecuador: a bibliometric study.厄瓜多尔癌症研究状况及其与癌症负担的关联：一项文献计量学研究。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 11;16(1):1307. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03168-w.
2
Exploring views of South African research ethics committees on pandemic preparedness and response during COVID-19.探索南非研究伦理委员会对COVID-19大流行防范与应对的看法。
Res Ethics. 2024 Oct;20(4):701-730. doi: 10.1177/17470161241250274. Epub 2024 May 4.
3
One hundred years of Ecuadorian biomedical scientific output and its association with the main causes of mortality: a bibliometric study.厄瓜多尔生物医学科学产出百年及其与主要死亡原因的关联：一项文献计量学研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 3;11:1395433. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1395433. eCollection 2024.
4
A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.非洲突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查流程的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.
5
Research ethics review during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international study.COVID-19 大流行期间的研究伦理审查：一项国际研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0292512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292512. eCollection 2024.
6
A Survey on Methodological Issues of Clinical Research Studies Reviewed by Independent Ethic Committees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.意大利 COVID-19 大流行期间独立伦理委员会审查的临床研究方法学问题调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811673.
7
COVID-19 research in LMICs.低收入和中等收入国家的COVID-19研究。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 2;398(10307):1212-1213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01605-6.
8
A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era.呼吁在新冠疫情时代加强而不是加速研究伦理委员会审查。
Ethics Hum Res. 2021 Sep;43(5):42-44. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500104.
9
In response to "The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador".回应《伦理评估特设委员会的负面影响：以厄瓜多尔与新冠疫情相关研究为例》
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Sep;21(3):100-101. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12326. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Metagenome of a Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sample from a Confirmed COVID-19 Case in Quito, Ecuador, Obtained Using Oxford Nanopore MinION Technology.使用牛津纳米孔MinION技术从厄瓜多尔基多一名确诊COVID-19病例的支气管肺泡灌洗样本中获得的宏基因组。
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020 Oct 8;9(41):e00996-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00996-20.
2
How we accelerated clinical trials in the age of coronavirus.我们如何在新冠病毒时代加速临床试验。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):326. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02416-z.
3
Advances in Clinical Research in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔临床研究进展
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 May;51(3):307-313. doi: 10.1177/2168479016680257. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.你的伦理委员会高效吗？使用“机构审查委员会指标”作为泰国玛希隆大学热带医学院持续改进的自我评估工具。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 18;9(11):e113356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113356. eCollection 2014.
5
Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region.世界卫生组织非洲区域国家研究伦理委员会的现状
BMC Med Ethics. 2005 Oct 20;6:E10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-6-10.
Zotero 插件