School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 244 North Hardin Hall 3310 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0982, USA.
School of Agriculture, Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29421-29431. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12774-4. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
The development of agriculture is linked to energy resources. Consequently, energy analysis in agroecosystems could be a useful tool for monitoring some measures in the agricultural sector to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. The objectives of this study were to (a) evaluate differences of energy indices in orange and kiwi orchards, and (b) point out whether inputs, outputs, efficiency, productivity, and carbon footprint can play a key role in crop replacement. Proportional stratified random sampling was used to select 26 orchards (10 oranges, 16 kiwis) from the Prefecture of Arta, western Greece, during 2015 and 2016. Univariate statistical methods were combined with multivariate ones. Nitrogen, Mg, Zn, herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, renewable energy inputs, fruit production, total outputs, and energy efficiency and productivity were statistically significantly high in the orange orchards. Phosphorus, Ca, irrigation, machinery, total inputs, intensity, non-renewable energy consumption, and carbon footprint were statistically significantly high in the kiwi orchards. The most important energy inputs for both fruit crops were fertilizers, fuels, irrigation, machinery, and herbicides. The orange orchards seem to be more friendly to the environment than the kiwi orchards by having low total energy inputs 32,210.3 MJ ha, intensity 1.4, consumption of non-renewable energy 0.7 MJ kg and CO equivalent/fruit production 0.08 kg kg, and high energy outputs 105,120.0 MJ ha and fruit production 53,648.0 kg ha. The findings of the present study show a relation between climate change and the production of farming systems, which can be a tool for decision makers. The correlation of the abovementioned parameters ensure higher profits and could help in achieving the best possible sustainable management of the agricultural ecosystems.
农业的发展与能源资源息息相关。因此,在农业生态系统中进行能源分析可能是监测农业部门减少温室气体排放的一些措施的有用工具。本研究的目的是:(a) 评估橙园和猕猴桃园的能源指标差异;(b) 指出投入、产出、效率、生产力和碳足迹是否可以在作物替代中发挥关键作用。采用比例分层随机抽样方法,于 2015 年至 2016 年在希腊西部阿尔塔州选择了 26 个果园(10 个橙子,16 个猕猴桃)。采用单变量统计方法和多变量统计方法相结合。橙子果园的氮、镁、锌、除草剂、杀虫剂、杀菌剂、可再生能源投入、水果产量、总产出以及能源效率和生产力均显著较高;猕猴桃果园的磷、钙、灌溉、机械、总投入、强度、不可再生能源消耗和碳足迹均显著较高。两种水果作物最重要的能源投入是肥料、燃料、灌溉、机械和除草剂。橙子果园的总能源投入 32210.3 MJ ha 较低,强度为 1.4,不可再生能源消耗 0.7 MJ kg 和 CO 当量/水果产量 0.08 kg kg,能源产出 105120.0 MJ ha 和水果产量 53648.0 kg ha 较高,因此,橙子果园似乎比猕猴桃果园更有利于环境。本研究的结果表明,气候变化与农业系统的生产之间存在联系,这可以作为决策者的工具。上述参数的相关性可以确保更高的利润,并有助于实现对农业生态系统的最佳可持续管理。