Suppr超能文献

胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤患者采用低轮廓与标准轮廓分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗的初步临床和放射学结果。

Preliminary Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of Matched Patients with Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Treated by Low-Profile vs Standard Profile Branched Aortic Endografts.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;75:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.095. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Durability of low-profile branched aortic stent-grafts (LPSG) in the treatment of patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) remains unclear. Objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of LPSG with standard profile branched aortic stent-grafts (SPSG).

METHODS

Between January 2016 and January 2020, 225 consecutive patients with TAAA were treated by branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR). Twenty-four patients who were treated with a LPSG were compared to 24 patients who received SPSG as a control group. Control patients were selected according to aneurysm size (maximum aneurysm diameter) and extension (Crawford classification) as well as availability of adequate preoperative and postoperative CT-angiograms at 24 months. The primary endpoint was ongoing clinical success defined as successful implantation and freedom from aneurysm- or procedure-related death, secondary intervention, type I or III endoleak, infection, thrombosis, aneurysm expansion or rupture and conversion. Secondary endpoints were radiological changes of the branched endograft (migration, shortening, scoliosis, lordosis, and fracture).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 22.6 (LPSG) and 26.2 months (SPSG), no significant difference was found in terms of technical success (100% in both groups), late mortality (4.2% vs 0%), aneurysm diameter increase (4.2% in both groups) and reinterventions (25% vs 37.5%). Infection, thrombosis, aneurysm expansion or rupture and conversion were not observed. Radiological analysis of aortic graft remodeling showed no fracture and no significant migration, shortening, scoliosis and lordosis of the LPSG (6.1 mm, 7.5 mm, 12.8° and 6.1°) compared to SPSG (3.9 mm, 5.1 mm, 7.9° and 5.6°) after 2 years.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and radiological findings of the present study showed no increased mortality and complications for the matched patients who underwent treatment with low-profile vs standard-profile BEVAR. This study provides preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy of low-profile branched endografts in patients with demanding iliac access vessels.

摘要

背景

在治疗胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)患者中,低轮廓分支主动脉覆膜支架(LPSG)的耐久性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较 LPSG 与标准轮廓分支主动脉覆膜支架(SPSG)的结果。

方法

2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月,225 例 TAAA 患者接受了分支腔内血管修复术(BEVAR)治疗。将 24 例接受 LPSG 治疗的患者与 24 例作为对照组的接受 SPSG 治疗的患者进行比较。对照组患者根据动脉瘤大小(最大动脉瘤直径)和延伸范围(Crawford 分类)以及 24 个月时是否有足够的术前和术后 CT 血管造影进行选择。主要终点是持续的临床成功,定义为成功植入和免于动脉瘤或手术相关的死亡、二次干预、I 型或 III 型内漏、感染、血栓形成、动脉瘤扩张或破裂以及转换。次要终点是分支覆膜支架的影像学变化(迁移、缩短、脊柱侧凸、脊柱前凸和骨折)。

结果

中位随访 22.6 个月(LPSG)和 26.2 个月(SPSG)后,两组在技术成功率(均为 100%)、晚期死亡率(4.2% vs 0%)、动脉瘤直径增加(两组均为 4.2%)和再次干预(25% vs 37.5%)方面无显著差异。未观察到感染、血栓形成、动脉瘤扩张或破裂以及转换。主动脉移植物重塑的影像学分析显示,与 SPSG 相比,LPSG 的骨折和明显的迁移、缩短、脊柱侧凸和前凸发生率较低(6.1mm、7.5mm、12.8°和 6.1°),而 SPSG 分别为 3.9mm、5.1mm、7.9°和 5.6°(6.1mm、7.5mm、12.8°和 6.1°)。

结论

本研究中匹配患者的临床和影像学结果显示,低轮廓与标准轮廓 BEVAR 治疗的患者死亡率和并发症无增加。本研究初步证实了低轮廓分支覆膜支架在髂内血管有要求的患者中的安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验