Braga Antonio, Padrón Lilian, Balen Jacir Luiz, Elias Kevin M, Horowitz Neil S, Berkowitz Ross S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University; Department of Maternal Child, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Drs. Braga and Padrón), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University (Dr. Braga), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói (Dr. Braga), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University; Department of Maternal Child, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Drs. Braga and Padrón), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Institute of Gynecology, Moncorvo Filho Hospital, Rio de Janeiro Federal University (Drs. Padrón and Balen), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Aug;28(8):1448-1449. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
To present the first hysteroscopic findings of 2 cases of complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) and partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) within the context of the patients' clinical histories.
Presentation of 2 hysteroscopic videos with narration of the intrauterine findings of molar pregnancy (MP) from Rio de Janeiro Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Reference Center.
MP is characterized by abnormal fertilization that generates 2 clinical syndromes: CHM and PHM [1].
In the first case, the patient was aged 50 years, and hysteroscopy was indicated to assess abnormal uterine bleeding in the presence of normal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and transvaginal ultrassonography showing an endometrial cavity with heterogeneous content. Hysteroscopy found translucent hydropic structures diagnosed as CHM. The negative hCG value was due to the hook effect (hCG after dilution: 2 240 000 IU/L). In the second case, an 18-year-old patient underwent hysteroscopy to assess the endometrial cavity with retained abortion at 7 weeks in which, during conservative management, the hCG level increased over 4 weeks from 25 000 IU/L to 58 000 IU/L. Hysteroscopy visualized the embryo with its umbilical cord and hydatidiform vesicles diagnosed as PHM.
MP can be an incidental finding during hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding or retained abortion [2-4]. Knowing its morphology during hysteroscopy is helpful for the correct management of this uncommon clinical situation. Hysteroscopy as an adjunct diagnostic tool (not as first-line treatment for MP) can be of significant benefit in challenging clinical scenarios. Further studies should assess the possible risk of spreading molar cells into the peritoneal cavity owing to hysteroscopic fluid.
结合患者临床病史,展示2例完全性葡萄胎(CHM)和部分性葡萄胎(PHM)的首次宫腔镜检查结果。
展示来自里约热内卢妊娠滋养细胞疾病参考中心的2段宫腔镜视频,并对葡萄胎妊娠(MP)的宫内检查结果进行解说。
MP的特征是受精异常,会产生2种临床综合征:CHM和PHM [1]。
第一例患者为50岁女性,因血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)正常但经阴道超声显示子宫内膜腔内容物不均质,行宫腔镜检查以评估异常子宫出血。宫腔镜检查发现半透明的水泡样结构,诊断为CHM。hCG值为阴性是由于钩状效应(稀释后hCG:2 240 000 IU/L)。第二例患者为18岁女性,因7周稽留流产行宫腔镜检查以评估子宫内膜腔,在保守治疗期间,hCG水平在4周内从25 000 IU/L升至58 000 IU/L。宫腔镜检查可见带有脐带的胚胎及葡萄样水泡,诊断为PHM。
MP可能是在宫腔镜检查异常子宫出血或稽留流产时的偶然发现[2-4]。了解其在宫腔镜检查时的形态有助于正确处理这种罕见的临床情况。宫腔镜作为一种辅助诊断工具(而非MP的一线治疗方法)在具有挑战性的临床场景中可能具有显著益处。进一步的研究应评估宫腔镜液体导致葡萄胎细胞播散至腹腔的潜在风险。