Department of Sociology, McGill University, Room 712, Leacock Building, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2T7, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113733. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113733. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
Studies surrounding egg donation often occur within existing legal marketplaces showing how language of altruism and gift is employed to uphold gendered standards of femininity and morality. This article examines how women negotiate those gendered and moral standards under the Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRA), which prohibited the market exchange of eggs through the criminalization of paid egg donation. Through 71 in-depth semi-structured interviews with health care professionals (n = 51) and egg donation recipients (n = 20), I argue that participants in these exchanges use a patchwork of moral framings to question the ethicality of the act and the gendered links between altruism, morality and femininity. These market participants employ moral patchworks consisting of subverting, circumventing and rejecting the legally defined ethical practice of donation. By explicitly discussing payment and gifts as moral egg donation exchanges, recipients and fertility professionals suggest that egg donors' reproductive labor should be monetarily recognized. This article considers the ethical implications of these moral patchworks for understanding how gender is reproduced and undone in market exchanges.
围绕卵子捐赠的研究通常发生在现有的合法市场中,展示了利他主义和礼物语言如何被用来维护女性气质和道德的性别标准。本文通过对 71 名医疗保健专业人员(51 名)和卵子捐赠接受者(20 名)的深入半结构化访谈,研究了在加拿大辅助人类生殖法案(AHRA)下,女性如何在该法案通过将有偿卵子捐赠定为刑事犯罪来禁止卵子市场交易的情况下,协商这些性别和道德标准。我认为,这些交易参与者使用拼凑的道德框架来质疑该行为的道德性,以及利他主义、道德和女性气质之间的性别联系。这些市场参与者采用道德拼凑的方式,包括颠覆、规避和拒绝捐赠的法律定义的道德实践。通过明确讨论支付和礼物作为道德卵子捐赠的交换,接受者和生育专业人员表明,卵子捐赠者的生殖劳动应该得到货币认可。本文考虑了这些道德拼凑对理解性别如何在市场交易中被复制和消除的伦理影响。