Rabbe Stefan, Blankart Carl R, Franz Wolfgang-Michael, Hager Lutz, Schreyögg Jonas
Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Jun;29(5):365-373. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20984024. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a non-invasive telemonitoring intervention on mortality, healthcare costs, and hospital and pharmaceutical utilisation in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) of a large statutory health insurer in Germany.
In a retrospective observational cohort study using real-world data, we assessed differences between 635 patients who received a telemonitoring intervention versus 635 receiving usual care covering 36 months after intervention. We used propensity score matching on a set of 102 parameters collected in the 24-month pre-intervention period to correct for observed differences, as well as difference-in-difference (DiD) estimators to account for unobserved differences. We analysed the effect of the intervention for up to three years on (i) all-cause mortality; (ii) costs (i.e. inpatient stays, ambulatory care, pharmaceuticals, and medical aids and appliances); and (iii) healthcare utilisation (i.e. length and number of hospital stays, number of prescriptions).
DiD estimates suggest lower inpatient costs of the telemonitoring group of up to €1160 (95% confidence interval (CI): -2253 to -69) in year three. Ambulatory care costs increased significantly in all three years up to €316 (95% CI: 1267 to 505) per year. Telemonitoring had a positive effect on survival (hazard ratio = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.99) and increased the number of prescriptions for diuretics. Effects were more prominent for patients with severe CHF.
The study suggests that the telemonitoring intervention led to a significant decrease in mortality and a shift in costs from the inpatient to the ambulatory care sector 36 months after intervention.
本研究旨在评估一项非侵入性远程监测干预措施对德国一家大型法定健康保险公司的慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的死亡率、医疗成本以及住院和药物使用情况的影响。
在一项使用真实世界数据的回顾性观察队列研究中,我们评估了635名接受远程监测干预的患者与635名接受常规护理的患者在干预后36个月内的差异。我们使用倾向得分匹配法对干预前24个月收集的102个参数进行匹配,以校正观察到的差异,并使用差分法(DiD)估计量来考虑未观察到的差异。我们分析了该干预措施长达三年对以下方面的影响:(i)全因死亡率;(ii)成本(即住院、门诊护理、药品以及医疗辅助器具);(iii)医疗利用情况(即住院时间和次数、处方数量)。
差分法估计表明,在第三年,远程监测组的住院成本降低了多达1160欧元(95%置信区间(CI):-2253至-69)。在所有三年中,门诊护理成本每年显著增加,高达316欧元(95%CI:1267至505)。远程监测对生存率有积极影响(风险比=0.71;95%CI:0.51至0.99),并增加了利尿剂的处方数量。对于重度CHF患者,效果更为显著。
该研究表明,远程监测干预措施在干预36个月后导致死亡率显著降低,且成本从住院部门转移到了门诊护理部门。