Bailey Amy, Korda Rosemary, Agostino Jason, Stanton Tony, Kelly Gabriela, Richman Tuppence, Greaves K
Department of Cardiology, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e038868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038868.
To describe (1) absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR) scores in patients presenting to hospital with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and (2) proportions of these patients on guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy according to their ACVDR score.
Cross-sectional study.
Single-site tertiary centre hospital, Queensland, Australia over a 12-month period.
Patients >18 years of age presenting to hospital with ACS due to coronary artery disease (CAD) confirmed by angiography.
Proportion of patients without prior history of CVD with a high ACVDR score, and of patients with a prior history of CVD, who are on guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy.
527 ACS patients were included of whom the mean age was 63 years and 75% were male. Overall, 66% (350) had no prior CVD and 34% (177) patients had prior CVD.In patients with no prior CVD, the proportions of patients with low, intermediate and high CVD risk scores were 41%, 24% and 36%. In the no prior CVD, high-risk patient group, 48% were on no preventative pharmacotherapy, 32% on single pharmacotherapy and 20% patients on complete guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy. In the prior CVD group, 7% patients were on no pharmacotherapy, 40% on incomplete pharmacotherapy and 53% were on complete guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy.
This study adds to the evidence on implementation gaps in guideline-recommended management of ACVDR, showing that a large proportion of patients presenting with ACS due to CAD were at high risk of developing CVD prior to the event and most were not on guideline-recommended treatment. A significant proportion of these events are likely to have been preventable, and therefore, increased assessment and appropriate treatment of ACVDR in primary care is needed to reduce the incidence of CVD events in the population.
描述(1)因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)入院患者的绝对心血管疾病风险(ACVDR)评分,以及(2)根据其ACVDR评分,这些患者接受指南推荐药物治疗的比例。
横断面研究。
澳大利亚昆士兰州的一家单中心三级医院,为期12个月。
因冠状动脉疾病(CAD)经血管造影确诊为ACS且年龄大于18岁的入院患者。
无心血管疾病(CVD)既往史且ACVDR评分高的患者比例,以及有CVD既往史且接受指南推荐药物治疗的患者比例。
纳入527例ACS患者,平均年龄63岁,75%为男性。总体而言,66%(350例)无CVD既往史,34%(177例)有CVD既往史。在无CVD既往史的患者中,低、中、高CVD风险评分患者的比例分别为41%、24%和36%。在无CVD既往史的高危患者组中,48%未接受预防性药物治疗,32%接受单一药物治疗,20%接受完全符合指南推荐的药物治疗。在有CVD既往史的患者组中,7%未接受药物治疗,40%接受不完全药物治疗,53%接受完全符合指南推荐的药物治疗。
本研究补充了关于ACVDR指南推荐管理中实施差距的证据,表明因CAD导致ACS的患者中有很大一部分在事件发生前就有发生CVD的高风险,且大多数未接受指南推荐的治疗。这些事件中很大一部分可能是可预防的,因此,需要在初级保健中加强对ACVDR的评估和适当治疗,以降低人群中CVD事件的发生率。