Suppr超能文献

基于panel 的纠错二代测序与流式细胞术检测急性髓系白血病(AML)微小残留病(MRD)的临床影响。

Clinical impact of panel-based error-corrected next generation sequencing versus flow cytometry to detect measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

机构信息

Haematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.

Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2021 May;35(5):1392-1404. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01131-6. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Abstract

We accrued 201 patients of adult AML treated with conventional therapy, in morphological remission, and evaluated MRD using sensitive error-corrected next generation sequencing (NGS-MRD) and multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM-MRD) at the end of induction (PI) and consolidation (PC). Nearly 71% of patients were PI NGS-MRD and 40.9% PC NGS-MRD (median VAF 0.76%). NGS-MRD patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of relapse (p = 0.003), inferior overall survival (p = 0.001) and relapse free survival (p < 0.001) as compared to NGS-MRD patients. NGS-MRD was predictive of inferior outcome in intermediate cytogenetic risk and demonstrated potential in favorable cytogenetic risk AML. PI NGS-MRD patients had a significantly improved survival as compared to patients who became NGS-MRD subsequently indicating that kinetics of NGS-MRD clearance was of paramount importance. NGS-MRD identified over 80% of cases identified by flow cytometry at PI time point whereas FCM identified 49.3% identified by NGS. Only a fraction of cases were NGS-MRD but FCM-MRD. NGS-MRD provided additional information of the risk of relapse when compared to FCM-MRD. We demonstrate a widely applicable, scalable NGS-MRD approach that is clinically informative and synergistic to FCM-MRD in AML treated with conventional therapies. Maximum clinical utility may be leveraged by combining FCM and NGS-MRD modalities.

摘要

我们对 201 名接受常规治疗、处于形态缓解期的成人 AML 患者进行了研究,在诱导结束时(PI)和巩固时(PC)使用敏感的纠错下一代测序(NGS-MRD)和多参数流式细胞术(FCM-MRD)评估了微小残留病(MRD)。近 71%的患者在 PI 时 NGS-MRD 和 40.9%在 PC 时 NGS-MRD(中位数 VAF 为 0.76%)。与 NGS-MRD 患者相比,NGS-MRD 患者的累积复发率显著更高(p=0.003),总生存率(p=0.001)和无复发生存率(p<0.001)更差。NGS-MRD 在中危细胞遗传学风险中预测预后不良,并在有利细胞遗传学风险 AML 中具有潜力。与随后成为 NGS-MRD 的患者相比,PI NGS-MRD 患者的生存显著改善,这表明 NGS-MRD 清除的动力学至关重要。与 PI 时间点的流式细胞术相比,NGS-MRD 可识别超过 80%的病例,而 FCM 可识别 49.3%的 NGS 病例。只有一部分病例为 NGS-MRD 但 FCM-MRD。与 FCM-MRD 相比,NGS-MRD 提供了有关复发风险的额外信息。我们展示了一种广泛适用、可扩展的 NGS-MRD 方法,该方法在接受常规治疗的 AML 中与 FCM-MRD 相比具有临床意义和协同作用。通过结合 FCM 和 NGS-MRD 模式,可能会获得最大的临床应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3424/8102181/0481b324a1d6/41375_2021_1131_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验