Use of radial access sheaths for transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures in children.

PURPOSE

Pediatric neuroendovascular procedures require special considerations. Given small vessel sizes, risk for arterial injury must be weighed against use of larger devices, with the diameter of the sheath being a known association with arterial complications. We recently transitioned to using thin-walled radial sheaths for transfemoral angiography in children, given their lower profile. Here, we report on these sheaths' technical success and complications, comparing against a historical cohort where regular vascular sheaths were employed.

METHODS

We retrospectively recorded patient and procedural data from 168 consecutive procedures from September 2017 to January 2019 when radial-specific sheaths were exclusively used at our tertiary pediatric hospital. These results were compared to data from September 2015 to January 2017, when regular vascular sheaths were exclusively used in 152 consecutive procedures. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t test or chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics (age, sex, weight) were not statistically different between the case and control group. No significant differences were found in the procedural data with the exception of heparin use which was higher in the radial-sheath cohort. There was a decrease in the rate of complications in the case group (1.2%) versus control group (2.6%), though not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Radial-specific sheaths have numerous beneficial characteristics that make them well-suited to the pediatric population. In our study, we show that radial sheaths are equally effective and safe perioperatively. Follow-up research may show if radial sheaths used transfemorally decrease long-term complications such as limb-length discrepancy and mortality.