University of Calgary, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Br J Haematol. 2021 May;193(3):532-541. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17350. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Bortezomib-containing regimens (BCRs) represented standard, first-line therapy for transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (TIMM) in Canada until the introduction of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Ld). However, little comparative data exist to inform the selection of regimens. We assessed the outcomes for TIMM patients treated with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone or prednisone (CyBorD/P), bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP), bortezomib and dexamethasone or prednisone (VD/P) and lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Ld) using the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database. Of 1156 TIMM patients evaluated, 82% received bortezomib combinations while 18% received Ld. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21·0, 21·1, 13·2 and 28·5 months (P = 0·0002) and median overall survival (OS) was 52·0, 63·6, 30·8 and 65·7 months (P < 0·0001) in the CyBorD/P, VMP, VD/P and Ld groups respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two triplet bortezomib regimens (VMP and CyBorD/P). Ld was associated with a longer PFS but not a significantly superior OS to date. Outcomes with the bortezomib-steroid doublet were inferior (VD/P). However, multivariable analysis identified features related to disease biology as the most important prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Such factors, as well as those affecting the physician's choice of regimen, are likely to influence the results observed with different regimens. This study demonstrated real-world outcomes in TIMM similar to those reported in clinical trials.
硼替佐米联合方案(BCR)代表了加拿大不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤(TIMM)的标准一线治疗方法,直到来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松(Ld)的引入。然而,几乎没有比较数据可以为方案选择提供信息。我们使用加拿大骨髓瘤研究小组数据库评估了接受环磷酰胺、硼替佐米和地塞米松或泼尼松(CyBorD/P)、硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松(VMP)、硼替佐米和地塞米松或泼尼松(VD/P)和来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松(Ld)治疗的 TIMM 患者的结局。在评估的 1156 名 TIMM 患者中,82%接受了硼替佐米联合方案,而 18%接受了 Ld。中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 21.0、21.1、13.2 和 28.5 个月(P=0.0002),中位总生存期(OS)分别为 52.0、63.6、30.8 和 65.7 个月(P<0.0001),分别在 CyBorD/P、VMP、VD/P 和 Ld 组。两种三药硼替佐米方案(VMP 和 CyBorD/P)之间的 PFS 和 OS 无显著差异。Ld 与更长的 PFS 相关,但目前与 OS 无显著优势相关。硼替佐米-类固醇二联方案的结果较差(VD/P)。然而,多变量分析确定了与疾病生物学相关的特征是 PFS 和 OS 的最重要预后因素。这些因素以及影响医生选择方案的因素,可能会影响不同方案的结果。本研究表明,TIMM 的真实世界结局与临床试验报告的结果相似。