Department of Cardiology, Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
J Hypertens. 2021 Apr 1;39(4):784-794. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002784.
We sought to evaluate the association of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or AT1 blockers (ARB) therapy with clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Electronic databases were searched to identify published studies that reported clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 who were or were not taking an ACEI/ARB. We studied all-cause mortality and/or severe disease outcomes. Fully adjusted effect estimates from individual studies were pooled using a random-effects model. In total, 34 (31 cohort-based and three case-control) studies met our eligibility criteria. Due to the inherent differences between cohort and case-control studies, we did not combine results of these studies but used them to identify the consistency of their results. The 31 cohort studies provided outcome data for 87 951 patients with COVID-19, of whom 22 383/83 963 (26.7%) were on ACEI/ARB therapy. In pooled analysis, we found no association between the use of ACEI/ARB and all-cause mortality/severe disease [relative risk: 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-1.03, I2 = 57%, P = 0.20] or occurrence of severe disease (relative risk: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.74-1.17, I2 = 56%, P = 0.55). Analysis of three population-based case-control studies identified no significant association between ACEI/ARB (pooled odds ratio: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.81-1.23, I2 = 0, P = 0.98) and all-cause mortality/severe disease. In 13 of the 31 cohort studies as well as in three case-control studies that reported outcomes separately for ACEI and ARB, there was no differential effect for mortality/severe disease outcomes.
In patients with COVID-19, we found no association between ACEI/ARB treatment and mortality/severe disease. ACEI/ARB should not be discontinued, unless clinically indicated.
我们旨在评估血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗与 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者临床结局的相关性。
电子数据库检索了报道 COVID-19 患者接受 ACEI/ARB 治疗与未接受 ACEI/ARB 治疗临床结局的已发表研究。我们研究了全因死亡率和/或重症疾病结局。使用随机效应模型对来自单个研究的完全调整后效应估计值进行了汇总。共有 34 项(31 项基于队列的研究和 3 项病例对照研究)符合纳入标准。由于队列研究和病例对照研究之间存在固有差异,我们未对这些研究的结果进行合并,而是用它们来确定其结果的一致性。31 项队列研究提供了 87951 例 COVID-19 患者的结局数据,其中 22383/83963(26.7%)接受 ACEI/ARB 治疗。在汇总分析中,我们未发现 ACEI/ARB 应用与全因死亡率/重症疾病之间存在关联[相对风险:0.94,95%置信区间(CI):0.86-1.03,I2=57%,P=0.20]或重症疾病的发生[相对风险:0.93,95% CI:0.74-1.17,I2=56%,P=0.55]。对 3 项基于人群的病例对照研究的分析未发现 ACEI/ARB 之间存在显著关联(汇总优势比:1.00,95% CI:0.81-1.23,I2=0,P=0.98)与全因死亡率/重症疾病。在 31 项队列研究中的 13 项以及在分别报告 ACEI 和 ARB 结局的 3 项病例对照研究中,死亡率/重症疾病结局无差异效应。
在 COVID-19 患者中,我们未发现 ACEI/ARB 治疗与死亡率/重症疾病之间存在关联。除非临床需要,否则不应停用 ACEI/ARB。