Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Izmir Behcet Uz Children's Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir.
Pediatric Hematology Unit.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;43(5):e613-e618. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002080.
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and death in immunocompromised patients. Data on efficacy and pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in pediatric patients are rare (1 to 5). Herein, we retrospectively analyzed adolescent patients who had received posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis.
We retrospectively analyzed patients who received posaconazole as primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis.
A total of 34 adolescent patients, 19 men (55.9%) and 15 women (44.1%) with a mean age of 15.8±2.1 years were included. Twenty-five of 34 (73.5%) patients were on primary and nine of 34 (26.5%) patients were on secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Diagnosis of the patients receiving posaconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis were acute myeloid leukemia (n=12, 48%), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n=7, 28%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=5, 20%), and Fanconi aplastic anemia (n=1, 4%). Five patients (55.6%) with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 1 patient with acute myeloid leukemia (11.1%), 1 patient with Fanconi aplastic anemia (11.1%), and 2 (22.2%) patients with chronic granulomatous disease received posaconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Twelve of 25 (48%) patients receiving posaconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis were complicated by IFI; 4 of them were proven, 6 probable, and 2 with possible IFI. Three of 9 patients (33.3%) receiving posaconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis was complicated by IFI (P=0.29), 2 of them were probable and 1 was possible IFI. Five of 25 patients (20%) receiving posaconazole as primary prophylaxis died because of IFI.
Improvement of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with high risk of invasive infections seems clearly necessary, and analyzing serum posaconazole levels and individualizing dosing may be 1 approach to improve outcomes.
侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是免疫功能低下患者发病和死亡的主要原因。有关泊沙康唑在儿科患者中的疗效和药代动力学的数据很少见(1 至 5)。在此,我们回顾性分析了接受泊沙康唑作为抗真菌预防治疗的青少年患者。
我们回顾性分析了接受泊沙康唑作为原发性或继发性抗真菌预防治疗的患者。
共纳入 34 例青少年患者,19 例男性(55.9%)和 15 例女性(44.1%),平均年龄为 15.8±2.1 岁。34 例患者中有 25 例(73.5%)接受原发性抗真菌预防治疗,9 例(26.5%)接受继发性抗真菌预防治疗。接受泊沙康唑作为原发性抗真菌预防治疗的患者的诊断为急性髓系白血病(n=12,48%)、造血干细胞移植(n=7,28%)、急性淋巴细胞白血病(n=5,20%)和范可尼贫血(n=1,4%)。5 例(55.6%)造血干细胞移植患者、1 例急性髓系白血病患者(11.1%)、1 例范可尼贫血患者(11.1%)和 2 例慢性肉芽肿病患者(22.2%)接受泊沙康唑作为继发性抗真菌预防治疗。25 例接受泊沙康唑作为原发性抗真菌预防治疗的患者中有 12 例(48%)并发 IFI;其中 4 例为确诊 IFI,6 例为可能 IFI,2 例为疑似 IFI。9 例接受泊沙康唑作为继发性抗真菌预防治疗的患者中有 3 例(33.3%)并发 IFI(P=0.29),其中 2 例为可能 IFI,1 例为疑似 IFI。25 例接受泊沙康唑作为原发性预防治疗的患者中有 5 例(20%)因 IFI 死亡。
显然需要改善高危侵袭性感染患者的抗真菌预防治疗,分析泊沙康唑的血清水平并进行个体化给药可能是改善结局的一种方法。