Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Mar;19(3):247-260. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1888715. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Over the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a treatment option for most patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). With growing indications and exponential increase in the number of TAVR procedures, it is important to be able to accurately predict mortality after TAVR.: Herein, we review the surgical and TAVR-specific mortality prediction models (MPMs) and their performance in their original derivation and external validation cohorts. We then discuss the role of other important risk assessment tools such as frailty, echocardiographic parameters, and biomarkers in patients, being considered for TAVR.: Conventional surgical MPMs have suboptimal predictive performance and are mis-calibrated when applied to TAVR populations. Although a number of TAVR-specific MPMs have been developed, their utility is also limited by their modest discriminative ability when applied to populations external to their original derivation cohorts. There is an unmet need for robust TAVR MPMs that accurately predict post TAVR mortality. In the interim, heart teams should utilize the currently available TAVR-specific MPMs in conjunction with other prognostic factors, such as frailty, echocardiographic or computed tomography (CT) imaging parameters, and biomarkers for risk assessment of patients, being considered for TAVR.
在过去的十年中,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为大多数严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的治疗选择。随着适应证的不断增加和 TAVR 手术数量的指数级增长,能够准确预测 TAVR 后的死亡率变得尤为重要。本文回顾了手术和 TAVR 特异性死亡率预测模型(MPM)及其在原始推导和外部验证队列中的性能。然后,我们讨论了其他重要的风险评估工具在考虑接受 TAVR 的患者中的作用,如脆弱性、超声心动图参数和生物标志物。传统的手术 MPM 预测性能不佳,应用于 TAVR 人群时存在校准误差。尽管已经开发了多种 TAVR 特异性 MPM,但当应用于其原始推导队列以外的人群时,其判别能力有限,其应用也受到限制。目前迫切需要能够准确预测 TAVR 后死亡率的强大 TAVR MPM。在此期间,心脏团队应将当前可用的 TAVR 特异性 MPM 与其他预后因素(如脆弱性、超声心动图或计算机断层扫描(CT)成像参数以及生物标志物)结合起来,用于评估考虑接受 TAVR 的患者的风险。