Suppr超能文献

二十一世纪的植物科学有多公平?植物生态学和进化领域对可重复性的迫切需求。

How FAIR are plant sciences in the twenty-first century? The pressing need for reproducibility in plant ecology and evolution.

机构信息

Plant Conservation Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, HW Pearson Building, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 10;288(1944):20202597. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2597.

Abstract

The need for open, reproducible science is of growing concern in the twenty-first century, with multiple initiatives like the widely supported FAIR principles advocating for data to be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. Plant ecological and evolutionary studies are not exempt from the need to ensure that the data upon which their findings are based are accessible and allow for replication in accordance with the FAIR principles. However, it is common that the collection and curation of herbarium specimens, a foundational aspect of studies involving plants, is neglected by authors. Without publicly available specimens, huge numbers of studies that rely on the field identification of plants are fundamentally not reproducible. We argue that the collection and public availability of herbarium specimens is not only good botanical practice but is also fundamental in ensuring that plant ecological and evolutionary studies are replicable, and thus scientifically sound. Data repositories that adhere to the FAIR principles must make sure that the original data are traceable to and re-examinable at their empirical source. In order to secure replicability, and adherence to the FAIR principles, substantial changes need to be brought about to restore the practice of collecting and curating specimens, to educate students of their importance, and to properly fund the herbaria which house them.

摘要

二十一世纪,开放、可重现的科学受到越来越多的关注,许多倡议,如得到广泛支持的 FAIR 原则,提倡数据应具有可发现性、可访问性、互操作性和可重用性。植物生态学和进化研究也需要确保其研究结果所依据的数据是可访问的,并符合 FAIR 原则,以便能够进行复制。然而,通常情况下,作者忽略了收集和保存植物标本这一基础性工作,而植物标本的收集和保存是涉及植物研究的基础。如果没有公开可用的标本,那么大量依赖于植物野外识别的研究从根本上就无法重现。我们认为,收集和公开植物标本不仅是良好的植物学实践,也是确保植物生态学和进化研究具有可重复性和科学性的基础。符合 FAIR 原则的数据存储库必须确保原始数据可追溯到其经验来源,并可在其来源处重新检查。为了确保可重复性和符合 FAIR 原则,需要进行重大变革,以恢复收集和保存标本的实践,教育学生标本的重要性,并为保存标本的标本馆提供适当的资金。

相似文献

3
4
Four key challenges in the open-data revolution.开放数据革命的四大挑战。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Sep;90(9):2000-2004. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13567.
7
Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software.提出研究软件的 FAIR 原则。
Sci Data. 2022 Oct 14;9(1):622. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01710-x.
10
An automated solution for measuring the progress toward FAIR research data.一种用于衡量迈向公平研究数据进展的自动化解决方案。
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Oct 29;2(11):100370. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100370. eCollection 2021 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Low availability of code in ecology: A call for urgent action.生态学领域代码可用性低:呼吁采取紧急行动。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 28;18(7):e3000763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000763. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
The ecologist who wants to map everything.这位想要绘制一切的生态学家。
Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7775):478-481. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02846-4.
7
Specimens as primary data: museums and 'open science'.作为原始数据的标本:博物馆与“开放科学”
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 May;30(5):237-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
8
Why vouchers matter in botanical research.凭证在植物学研究中的重要性。
Appl Plant Sci. 2013 Oct 29;1(11). doi: 10.3732/apps.1300076. eCollection 2013 Nov.
9
The Open Knowledge Foundation: open data means better science.开放知识基金会:开放数据意味着更好的科学。
PLoS Biol. 2011 Dec;9(12):e1001195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
10
Natural history collections as sources of long-term datasets.自然历史藏品作为长期数据集的来源。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):153-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验