One-year comparison of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and half-dose photodynamic therapies for pachychoroid neovasculopathy.

BACKGROUND

To compare 1-year outcomes between anti-vascular endothelial factor (VEGF) therapy and half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment-naive pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) with subretinal fluid (SRF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with treatment-naive PNV patients with SRF treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections or half-dose PDT followed by as-needed schedule with 1-year follow-up were studied retrospectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-two eyes of 82 patients were eligible: 50 eyes underwent anti-VEGF therapy and 32 eyes underwent half-dose PDT. SRF resolved in 41 (82%) of 50 eyes after initial three monthly injections and 31 (96.9%) of 32 eyes 3 months after initial PDT, and 43 (86%) eyes and 30 (94%) eyes 1 year after initial anti-VEGF injection and half-dose PDT, respectively. No significant differences were found in SRF resolution rates 3 months and 1 year after initial treatment between the two treatment groups. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly after initial three monthly injections (P = 0.025) and initial PDT (P = 0.022) compared with baseline; the improvements were maintained 1 year after initial treatment in the two treatment groups. No significant differences were found in BCVA between the two treatment groups at baseline and throughout the 1-year follow-up period. Mean (± standard error) numbers of intravitreal injections and PDT over 12 months were 3.7 ± 0.16 and 1.1 ± 0.06, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments are similarly effective on SRF resolution and VA improvement 1 year after the initial treatment. Half-dose PDT may be an option for treatment for PNV. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.