Oli Angus Nnamdi, Ogwaluonye Uchenna Chukwunonso, Onubogu Chinyere Ukamaka, Ozumba Abraham Faith, Agbaenyi Obinna Henry, Okeke Kenneth Nchekwube, Onah Stanley Kenechukwu, Okoro Jude C, Ifezulike Christian Chukwuemeka, Emechebe George O
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Agulu, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nnewi, Anambra State, 435101, Nigeria.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 2;14:247-257. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S279397. eCollection 2021.
Immunization programs suffer recurrent setbacks in developing countries.
We evaluated the knowledge and opinion of parents towards childhood immunization.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 2400 parents/guardians in two major Anambra cities.
The male:female ratio was 1:1 and about two-third (64.3%) of respondents were aged 21-40 years. The majority were married (85.0%), Christians (88.3%), and had heard about childhood immunization (92.3%) mainly from formal settings (56.5%). A little above half (56.2%) of them correctly cited "disease prevention" as reason for childhood immunization. A larger proportion of those that gave this correct response worked in tertiary institutions and had post-secondary school education (<0.001). The majority of the respondents appropriately agreed or disagreed with opinions that can influence immunization uptake. However, some of them did not agree that immunization was important during the first year of life (16.7%) or afterwards (23.1%); to ensure full immunization (22.8%) or maintain proper immunization records (25.6%) of their children; and to actively support childhood immunization (33.9%). Likewise, some respondents would withhold immunization for perceived fear of adverse reactions (30.7%) or if naturally acquired infection was perceived to confer better protection (28.2%). Respondents who worked in tertiary institutions, and had higher education or family income were more likely to agree or disagree appropriately to opinions. Males had comparable opinions with females although females seemed to do better in opinions that reflect actual vaccination practice.
Awareness of the term "immunization" was high although knowledge of its indication did not measure up with this awareness, especially among the less educated. Most parents, especially those who worked in tertiary institutions,r had higher income, or education, were favorably disposed towards opinions that could positively influence immunization uptake. Efforts should be intensified at improving awareness on the indication, benefits and safety of immunization, and improving public opinions in order to optimize childhood immunization.
免疫规划在发展中国家屡遭挫折。
我们评估了家长对儿童免疫接种的知识和看法。
在阿南布拉州两个主要城市的2400名家长/监护人中开展了一项横断面研究。
男女比例为1:1,约三分之二(64.3%)的受访者年龄在21至40岁之间。大多数人已婚(85.0%),是基督徒(88.3%),并且听说过儿童免疫接种(92.3%),主要是从正规渠道(56.5%)听说的。略高于一半(56.2%)的人正确地将“疾病预防”列为儿童免疫接种的原因。给出这一正确回答的人中,较大比例在高等院校工作且接受过高等教育(<0.001)。大多数受访者对可能影响免疫接种接受度的观点给予了适当的赞同或反对。然而,他们中的一些人不同意免疫接种在生命的第一年(16.7%)或之后(23.1%)很重要;不同意为确保孩子完全免疫接种(22.8%)或保存适当的免疫接种记录(25.6%);也不同意积极支持儿童免疫接种(33.9%)。同样,一些受访者会因担心不良反应(30.7%)或认为自然获得的感染能提供更好的保护(28.2%)而拒绝免疫接种。在高等院校工作、受过高等教育或家庭收入较高的受访者更有可能对这些观点给予适当的赞同或反对。男性与女性的看法相当,不过在反映实际疫苗接种做法的观点上,女性似乎表现得更好。
“免疫接种”一词的知晓度较高,但其适应证的知识水平与这种知晓度不匹配,尤其是在受教育程度较低的人群中。大多数家长,尤其是那些在高等院校工作、收入较高或受过教育的家长,对可能积极影响免疫接种接受度的观点持赞同态度。应加大力度提高对免疫接种适应证、益处和安全性的认识,并改善公众看法,以优化儿童免疫接种。