• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响胆囊腺癌治愈性切除的因素:临床决策与生存分析。

Factors that Minimize Curative Resection for Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma: an Analysis of Clinical Decision-Making and Survival.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep;25(9):2344-2352. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04942-1. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-021-04942-1
PMID:33565014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis as it is often diagnosed incidentally, and patients have a high risk for residual and occult metastatic disease. Expert guidelines recommend definitive surgery for ≥T1b tumors; however, surgical management is inconsistent. This study evaluates the factors that affect the completion of radical resection with portal lymphadenectomy and its impact on survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer from 2008 to 2017 at an academic institution was performed. Patients were analyzed based on whether they underwent definitive surgical resection. Patient factors and clinical decision-making were analyzed; overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with ≥T1b tumors were identified, of who 32 (42.7%) underwent definitive resection. Fifty-four (72%) patients had gallbladder cancer identified as an incidental diagnosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Among patients who did not undergo definitive resection, the underlying factors were varied. Only 24 (55.8%) patients in the non-definitive resection group were seen by surgical oncology. Among patients who underwent re-operation for definitive resection, 12 (38.7%) were upstaged on final pathology. Of the 43 patients who did not undergo definitive resection, 4 (9.3%) had metastatic disease identified during attempted re-resection. Patients who underwent definitive resection had a significantly longer median overall survival compared to those who did not (4.3 v. 1.9 years, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing definitive resection have a significantly improved survival, including as part of a re-operative strategy. Universal referral to a surgical specialist is a modifiable factor resulting in increased definitive resection rates.

摘要

背景

胆囊腺癌预后较差,因为它通常是偶然诊断出来的,而且患者有残余和隐匿性转移疾病的高风险。专家指南建议对≥T1b 肿瘤进行确定性手术;然而,手术管理并不一致。本研究评估了影响根治性切除伴门脉淋巴结清扫术完成的因素及其对生存的影响。

方法

对 2008 年至 2017 年在一所学术机构接受胆囊癌手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。根据患者是否接受确定性手术进行了分析。分析了患者的因素和临床决策;使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较总生存率。

结果

确定了 75 名≥T1b 肿瘤患者,其中 32 名(42.7%)接受了确定性手术。54 名(72%)患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后意外发现胆囊癌。在未行确定性切除术的患者中,潜在因素各不相同。只有 24 名(55.8%)非确定性切除术患者接受了外科肿瘤学治疗。在接受确定性再手术的患者中,12 名(38.7%)患者的最终病理分期升高。在未行确定性切除术的 43 名患者中,4 名(9.3%)在试图再次切除时发现转移性疾病。行确定性切除术的患者中位总生存期明显长于未行确定性切除术的患者(4.3 比 1.9 年,p = 0.02)。

结论

行确定性切除术的患者的生存显著改善,包括作为再次手术策略的一部分。普遍转介给外科专家是一个可改变的因素,可提高确定性切除术的比例。

相似文献

1
Factors that Minimize Curative Resection for Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma: an Analysis of Clinical Decision-Making and Survival.影响胆囊腺癌治愈性切除的因素:临床决策与生存分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep;25(9):2344-2352. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04942-1. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Managing the incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: algorithms and controversies.偶然发现的胆囊癌的处理:算法和争议。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S108-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.367. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
3
Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection.胆囊癌:腹腔镜检查与根治性切除术的作用
Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):893-901. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31806beec2.
4
[Immediate radical re-resection of incidental T1b  gallbladder cancer and the problem of an adequate extent of resection (results of the German Registry "Incidental Gallbladder Cancer")].[意外发现的T1b期胆囊癌的即刻根治性再次切除术及切除范围是否足够的问题(德国“意外胆囊癌”登记研究结果)]
Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Dec;139 Suppl 2:e43-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262698. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
5
Does a second resection provide a survival benefit in patients diagnosed with incidental T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer following cholecystectomy?对于胆囊切除术后诊断为偶然发现的T1b/T2期胆囊癌患者,二次切除是否能带来生存获益?
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Feb;19(2):104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
6
Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection.胆囊癌:明确原发性根治性切除术和根治性再次切除术的适应证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):833-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9097-6. Epub 2006 Nov 11.
7
Long-term outcomes of surgical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: an institutional evaluation.T1b 期胆囊癌行手术切除的长期疗效:一项机构评估。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6507-2.
8
Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中偶然发现的胆囊癌:处理意外发现。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 14;18(30):4019-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.4019.
9
Incidental pT2-T3 gallbladder cancer after a cholecystectomy: outcome of staging at 3 months prior to a radical resection.胆囊切除术后偶然发现的 pT2-T3 胆囊癌:在根治性切除术前 3 个月进行分期的结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Aug;15(8):633-7. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12032. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
10
Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: How Residual Disease Affects Outcome in Two Referral HPB Centers from South America.意外胆囊癌:残留疾病如何影响来自南美洲的两个肝脏胰腺胆管疾病转诊中心的治疗结果。
World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):214-220. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4762-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Residual cancer is a strong predictor of survival in T3 incidental gallbladder cancer.残余癌是 T3 偶然发现的胆囊癌生存的强有力预测因子。
BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01869-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in Treatment for Gallbladder Carcinoma: Does Treatment Site Matter?胆囊癌治疗中的差异:治疗部位是否重要?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May;24(5):1071-1076. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04389-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Estimating survival benefit of adjuvant therapy based on a Bayesian network prediction model in curatively resected advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma.基于贝叶斯网络预测模型估算可切除的晚期胆囊腺癌辅助治疗的生存获益。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct 7;25(37):5655-5666. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5655.
3
Management of incidental gallbladder cancer in a national cohort.
在全国队列中对偶然胆囊癌的管理。
Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1216-1227. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11205. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
4
The role of surgery and adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive cancers of the gallbladder and intrahepatic bile ducts.手术及辅助治疗在胆囊和肝内胆管淋巴结阳性癌症中的作用。
Cancer. 2018 Jan 1;124(1):74-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30968. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
5
Surgical Management of Gallbladder Cancer: Simple Versus Extended Cholecystectomy and the Role of Adjuvant Therapy.胆囊癌的外科治疗:单纯与扩大胆囊切除术及辅助治疗的作用。
Ann Surg. 2017 Oct;266(4):625-631. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002385.
6
Gallbladder Carcinoma in the United States: A Population Based Clinical Outcomes Study Involving 22,343 Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Database (1973-2013).美国胆囊癌:一项基于人群的临床结局研究,涉及监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(1973 - 2013年)中的22343例患者。
HPB Surg. 2017;2017:1532835. doi: 10.1155/2017/1532835. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Gallbladder carcinoma: Prognostic factors and therapeutic options.胆囊癌:预后因素与治疗选择
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12211-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12211.
8
Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement.胆囊癌:专家共识声明。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Aug;17(8):681-90. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12444.
9
Adequate extent in radical re-resection of incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German Registry.偶然胆囊癌根治性再切除的充分范围:德国登记处的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2156-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0914-4. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
10
Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer.淋巴结评估与早期胆囊癌手术后生存率的提高相关。
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):706-11; discussion 711-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056.