Niv D, Ber A, Rudick V, Leykin Y, David M P, Geller E
Department of Anesthesia, Serlin Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel.
Isr J Med Sci. 1988 Feb;24(2):80-3.
A study was carried out on the mode of vaginal delivery in two large groups of parturients: one group comprised 11,264, of whom 0.1% were given epidural analgesia (1977-78) and the other, 10,650, of whom 50% delivered under epidural blockade (1982-83). When the incidence and reasons for instrumental intervention in these two groups were analyzed, it was found that the rate of instrumental delivery was only 1.3% higher (P less than 0.001) in the latter group, which was mainly due to factors not attributable to the epidural blockade. It may be concluded from this survey that epidural analgesia for labor and delivery does not cause an increase in the rate of instrumental delivery.
一组有11264名产妇,其中0.1%接受了硬膜外镇痛(1977 - 1978年);另一组有10650名产妇,其中50%在硬膜外阻滞下分娩(1982 - 1983年)。当分析这两组器械助产的发生率及原因时,发现后一组器械助产率仅高1.3%(P小于0.001),这主要是由于与硬膜外阻滞无关的因素。从这项调查可以得出结论,分娩时的硬膜外镇痛不会导致器械助产率增加。