Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2339-2347. doi: 10.1111/add.15444. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
A previous research study concluded that wine and beer labelled as lower in strength increase consumption compared with the same drinks labelled as regular strength. The label included both a verbal and numerical descriptor of strength. The present study aimed to estimate the effect of each of these label components.
Adaptive, parallel group randomised controlled trial, comprising an internal pilot sample (n = 90) and a confirmatory sample (n = 57).
University bar laboratory in London, United Kingdom (UK).
A total of 147 weekly wine drinkers were sampled from a nationally representative English panel.
Participants were randomised to one of three groups to taste test wine in a bar-laboratory, varying only in the label displayed: (i) verbal descriptor only (Super Low); (ii) numerical descriptor only (4% alcohol by volume (ABV)); and (iii) verbal descriptor and numerical descriptor combined (Super Low 4%ABV) (each group n = 49).
The primary outcome was total volume (ml) of wine consumed.
Participants randomised to the numerical descriptor label group (4%ABV: M = 155.12 ml, B = 20.30; 95% CI = 3.92, 36.69; P value = 0.016) and combined verbal and numerical descriptor label group (Super Low 4%ABV: M = 154.59 ml, B = 20.68; 95% CI = 4.32, 37.04; P value = 0.014) drank significantly greater amounts than those randomised to the verbal descriptor label group (Super Low: M = 125.65 ml).
This bar laboratory study estimated that a greater quantity of 'lower' strength wine was consumed when the label included a numerical strength descriptor compared with a verbal only strength descriptor.
先前的一项研究得出结论,与标有普通强度的相同饮料相比,标有低强度的葡萄酒和啤酒标签会增加消费。标签同时包含强度的口头和数字描述符。本研究旨在估计这些标签成分中的每一个的影响。
适应性、平行组随机对照试验,包括内部试点样本(n=90)和确认样本(n=57)。
英国伦敦大学酒吧实验室。
从全国代表性的英语小组中抽取了总共 147 名每周饮酒者进行品尝测试。
参与者被随机分配到酒吧实验室品尝三种不同标签的葡萄酒,唯一的区别在于标签显示:(i)仅口头描述符(超级低);(ii)仅数字描述符(4%酒精度(ABV));(iii)口头描述符和数字描述符组合(超级低 4%ABV)(每组 n=49)。
主要结果是消耗的葡萄酒总量(ml)。
随机分配到数字描述符标签组(4%ABV:M=155.12ml,B=20.30;95%CI=3.92,36.69;P 值=0.016)和组合口头和数字描述符标签组(超级低 4%ABV:M=154.59ml,B=20.68;95%CI=4.32,37.04;P 值=0.014)比随机分配到口头描述符标签组(超级低:M=125.65ml)的参与者喝的量明显更大。
这项酒吧实验室研究估计,与仅包含口头强度描述符的标签相比,当标签包含数字强度描述符时,会消耗更多“低强度”的葡萄酒。