• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.进行和解读前列腺 MRI 的实践模式和挑战:美国腹部放射学会前列腺疾病重点专家组的调查。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):952-959. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23256. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Radiologists' preferences regarding content of prostate MRI reports: a survey of the Society of Abdominal Radiology.放射科医生对前列腺 MRI 报告内容的偏好:对腹部放射学会的调查。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jul;43(7):1807-1812. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1393-z.
3
Imaging Facilities' Adherence to PI-RADS v2 Minimum Technical Standards for the Performance of Prostate MRI.影像设备对前列腺 MRI 执行 PI-RADS v2 最低技术标准的遵从情况。
Acad Radiol. 2018 Feb;25(2):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
Prostate MRI: access to and current practice of prostate MRI in the United States.前列腺磁共振成像:美国前列腺磁共振成像的应用现状和实践情况。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.006. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
5
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel.26 家中心前列腺 MRI 中 PI-RADS 的阳性预测值的可变性:腹放射学会前列腺癌疾病重点专家组的经验。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):76-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020190646. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Effect of Prostate MRI Interpretation Experience on PPV Using PI-RADS Version 2: A 6-Year Assessment Among Eight Fellowship-Trained Radiologists.前列腺 MRI 解读经验对 PI-RADS 版本 2 的 PPV 的影响:8 名 fellowship 培训放射科医生的 6 年评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Sep;219(3):453-460. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27421. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
MRI of the Prostate in Germany: Online Survey among Radiologists.德国前列腺的磁共振成像:放射科医生在线调查
Rofo. 2015 Aug;187(8):703-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399566. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
The Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Focal Therapy (TARGET): A Systematic Review and International Consensus Recommendations.《经局部治疗后行前列腺 MRI 评估的跨大西洋推荐意见(TARGET):系统评价与国际共识推荐意见》。
Eur Urol. 2024 May;85(5):466-482. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.前列腺多参数磁共振成像:两种评分系统的诊断性能及阅片者间一致性
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20151056. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151056. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
10
Multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate at 1.5-T without endorectal coil using an 8 channel pelvic phased array: Is it still a viable option?1.5T 无直肠内线圈 8 通道盆腔相控阵线圈前列腺多参数磁共振成像:是否仍然可行?
Radiography (Lond). 2021 May;27(2):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Imaging and Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Survey From the Asian Prostate Imaging Working Group.使用影像学和活检在前列腺癌诊断中的作用:来自亚洲前列腺影像学工作组的一项调查。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Nov;24(11):1102-1113. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0644.
2
Multi-practice survey on MR imaging practice patterns in rectal cancer in the United States.美国多实践直肠磁共振成像实践模式调查。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jan;47(1):28-37. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03279-2. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel.26 家中心前列腺 MRI 中 PI-RADS 的阳性预测值的可变性:腹放射学会前列腺癌疾病重点专家组的经验。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):76-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020190646. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology.人工智能对放射学的影响:欧洲放射学会成员的一项欧洲人工智能医学影像项目(EuroAIM)调查。
Insights Imaging. 2019 Oct 31;10(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0798-3.
3
Update of the Standard Operating Procedure on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌诊断、分期和管理中使用多参数磁共振成像的标准操作程序更新。
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):706-712. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000617. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Thoracic Imaging-Current Practices and Utility: Survey of the Society of Thoracic Radiology.胸部影像学中的双能 CT:当前实践和应用:胸放射学会调查。
J Thorac Imaging. 2020 Mar;35(2):W43-W50. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000450.
5
Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: A systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol.前列腺 MRI 技术参数标准化:对 PI-RADSv2 采集方案依从性的系统评价。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Nov;120:108662. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108662. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards.多中心评估前列腺 MRI 质量及对英国和国际标准的遵循情况。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Nov;74(11):894.e19-894.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.026. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.PI-RADS 指导委员会:PI-RADS 多参数 MRI 和 MRI 引导活检途径。
Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):464-474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
8
National Survey of Patterns Employing Targeted MRI/US Guided Prostate Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer.关于采用靶向磁共振成像/超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检进行前列腺癌诊断和分期的模式的全国性调查。
Curr Urol. 2019 Mar 8;12(2):97-103. doi: 10.1159/000489426.
9
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版 2019 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for MRI of Prostate Cancer: Can We Do Better?前列腺癌MRI的前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版:我们能做得更好吗?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jun;212(6):1244-1252. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21178. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

进行和解读前列腺 MRI 的实践模式和挑战:美国腹部放射学会前列腺疾病重点专家组的调查。

Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 West 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):952-959. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23256. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.20.23256
PMID:33566638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9254902/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report on the practice patterns and challenges of performing and interpreting prostate MRI. An electronic survey regarding prostate MRI practice patterns and challenges was sent to members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology. The response rate was 15% (212/1446). Most (65%) of the respondents were academic abdominal radiologists with 1-5 (52%), 6-10 (20%), 11-20 (15%), and more than 20 (5%) years of experience in reporting prostate MRI. The numbers of prostate MRI examinations reported per week were 0-5 (43%), 6-10 (38%), 11-20 (12%), 21-30 (5%), and more than 30 (2%). Imaging was performed at 3 T (58%), 1.5 T (20%), or either (21%), and most examinations (83%) were performed without an endorectal coil. Highest b values ranged from 800 to 5000 s/mm; 1400 s/mm (26%) and 1500 s/mm (30%) were the most common. Most respondents (79%) acquired dynamic contrast-enhanced images with temporal resolution of less than 10 seconds. Most (71%) of the prostate MRI studies were used for fusion biopsy. PI-RADS version 2 was used by 92% of the respondents and template reporting by 80%. Challenges to performing and interpreting prostate MRI were scored on a 1-5 Likert scale (1, easy; 2, somewhat easy; 3, neutral; 4, somewhat difficult; 5, very difficult). The median scores were 2 or 3 for patient preparatory factors. Image acquisition and reporting factors were scored 1-2, except for performing spectroscopy or using an endorectal coil, both of which scored 4. Acquiring patient history scored 2 and quality factors scored 3. Most radiologists perform prostate MRI at 3 T without an endorectal coil and interpret the images using PI-RADS version 2. Challenges include obtaining quality images, acquiring feedback, and variability in the interpretation of PI-RADS scores.

摘要

本研究旨在报告前列腺 MRI 的实践模式和挑战。我们向腹部放射学会成员发送了一份关于前列腺 MRI 实践模式和挑战的电子调查。回复率为 15%(212/1446)。大多数(65%)受访者为学术性腹部放射科医生,报告前列腺 MRI 的经验为 1-5 年(52%)、6-10 年(20%)、11-20 年(15%)和 20 年以上(5%)。每周报告的前列腺 MRI 检查数量为 0-5 次(43%)、6-10 次(38%)、11-20 次(12%)、21-30 次(5%)和 30 次以上(2%)。成像在 3T(58%)、1.5T(20%)或两者(21%)进行,大多数检查(83%)在没有直肠内线圈的情况下进行。最高 b 值范围为 800 至 5000 s/mm;1400 s/mm(26%)和 1500 s/mm(30%)最为常见。大多数受访者(79%)获取了时间分辨率小于 10 秒的动态对比增强图像。大多数(71%)前列腺 MRI 研究用于融合活检。92%的受访者使用 PI-RADS 版本 2,80%使用模板报告。前列腺 MRI 的执行和解释的挑战以 1-5 分制的李克特量表进行评分(1,容易;2,有些容易;3,中性;4,有些困难;5,非常困难)。患者准备因素的中位数为 2 或 3。除了进行光谱分析或使用直肠内线圈外,图像采集和报告因素的评分均为 1-2,两者均为 4。获取患者病史评分为 2,质量因素评分为 3。大多数放射科医生在 3T 无直肠内线圈的情况下进行前列腺 MRI,并使用 PI-RADS 版本 2 来解释图像。挑战包括获取高质量的图像、获取反馈以及 PI-RADS 评分解释的变异性。