Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 West 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):952-959. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23256. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
The purpose of this study was to report on the practice patterns and challenges of performing and interpreting prostate MRI. An electronic survey regarding prostate MRI practice patterns and challenges was sent to members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology. The response rate was 15% (212/1446). Most (65%) of the respondents were academic abdominal radiologists with 1-5 (52%), 6-10 (20%), 11-20 (15%), and more than 20 (5%) years of experience in reporting prostate MRI. The numbers of prostate MRI examinations reported per week were 0-5 (43%), 6-10 (38%), 11-20 (12%), 21-30 (5%), and more than 30 (2%). Imaging was performed at 3 T (58%), 1.5 T (20%), or either (21%), and most examinations (83%) were performed without an endorectal coil. Highest b values ranged from 800 to 5000 s/mm; 1400 s/mm (26%) and 1500 s/mm (30%) were the most common. Most respondents (79%) acquired dynamic contrast-enhanced images with temporal resolution of less than 10 seconds. Most (71%) of the prostate MRI studies were used for fusion biopsy. PI-RADS version 2 was used by 92% of the respondents and template reporting by 80%. Challenges to performing and interpreting prostate MRI were scored on a 1-5 Likert scale (1, easy; 2, somewhat easy; 3, neutral; 4, somewhat difficult; 5, very difficult). The median scores were 2 or 3 for patient preparatory factors. Image acquisition and reporting factors were scored 1-2, except for performing spectroscopy or using an endorectal coil, both of which scored 4. Acquiring patient history scored 2 and quality factors scored 3. Most radiologists perform prostate MRI at 3 T without an endorectal coil and interpret the images using PI-RADS version 2. Challenges include obtaining quality images, acquiring feedback, and variability in the interpretation of PI-RADS scores.
本研究旨在报告前列腺 MRI 的实践模式和挑战。我们向腹部放射学会成员发送了一份关于前列腺 MRI 实践模式和挑战的电子调查。回复率为 15%(212/1446)。大多数(65%)受访者为学术性腹部放射科医生,报告前列腺 MRI 的经验为 1-5 年(52%)、6-10 年(20%)、11-20 年(15%)和 20 年以上(5%)。每周报告的前列腺 MRI 检查数量为 0-5 次(43%)、6-10 次(38%)、11-20 次(12%)、21-30 次(5%)和 30 次以上(2%)。成像在 3T(58%)、1.5T(20%)或两者(21%)进行,大多数检查(83%)在没有直肠内线圈的情况下进行。最高 b 值范围为 800 至 5000 s/mm;1400 s/mm(26%)和 1500 s/mm(30%)最为常见。大多数受访者(79%)获取了时间分辨率小于 10 秒的动态对比增强图像。大多数(71%)前列腺 MRI 研究用于融合活检。92%的受访者使用 PI-RADS 版本 2,80%使用模板报告。前列腺 MRI 的执行和解释的挑战以 1-5 分制的李克特量表进行评分(1,容易;2,有些容易;3,中性;4,有些困难;5,非常困难)。患者准备因素的中位数为 2 或 3。除了进行光谱分析或使用直肠内线圈外,图像采集和报告因素的评分均为 1-2,两者均为 4。获取患者病史评分为 2,质量因素评分为 3。大多数放射科医生在 3T 无直肠内线圈的情况下进行前列腺 MRI,并使用 PI-RADS 版本 2 来解释图像。挑战包括获取高质量的图像、获取反馈以及 PI-RADS 评分解释的变异性。