• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧预防性降低风险手术在未受影响的女性和携带者中的应用及效果。

Uptake and efficacy of bilateral risk reducing surgery in unaffected female and carriers.

机构信息

Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2022 Feb;59(2):133-140. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356
PMID:33568438
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women testing positive for pathogenic variants have high lifetime risks of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer. The effectiveness of risk reducing surgery (RRS) has been demonstrated in numerous previous studies. We evaluated long-term uptake, timing and effectiveness of risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in healthy carriers.

METHODS

Women were prospectively followed up from positive genetic test (GT) result to censor date. χ² testing compared categorical variables; Cox regression model estimated HRs and 95% CI for BC/ovarian cancer cases associated with RRS, and impact on all-cause mortality; Kaplan-Meier curves estimated cumulative RRS uptake. The annual cancer incidence was estimated by women-years at risk.

RESULTS

In total, 887 women were included in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 6.26 years (range=0.01-24.3; total=4685.4 women-years). RRS was performed in 512 women, 73 before GT. Overall RRM uptake was 57.9% and RRSO uptake was 78.6%. The median time from GT to RRM was 18.4 months, and from GT to RRSO-10.0 months. Annual BC incidence in the study population was 1.28%. Relative BC risk reduction (RRM versus non-RRM) was 94%. Risk reduction of ovarian cancer (RRSO versus non-RRSO) was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Over a 24-year period, we observed an increasing number of women opting for RRS. We showed that the timing of RRS remains suboptimal, especially in women undergoing RRSO. Both RRM and RRSO showed a significant effect on relevant cancer risk reduction. However, there was no statistically significant RRSO protective effect on BC.

摘要

背景

检测到致病性变体呈阳性的女性患乳腺癌(BC)和卵巢癌的终生风险很高。大量先前的研究已经证明了降低风险手术(RRS)的有效性。我们评估了健康携带者中降低风险的乳房切除术(RRM)和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)的长期接受程度、时机和有效性。

方法

从阳性基因检测(GT)结果到截止日期对女性进行前瞻性随访。卡方检验比较分类变量;Cox 回归模型估计与 RRS 相关的 BC/卵巢癌病例的 HR 和 95%CI,并评估对全因死亡率的影响;Kaplan-Meier 曲线估计累积 RRS 接受率。通过风险妇女的年数估计每年的癌症发病率。

结果

总共 887 名女性纳入本分析。平均随访时间为 6.26 年(范围=0.01-24.3;总=4685.4 名妇女年)。512 名女性接受了 RRS,其中 73 名在 GT 之前。总体 RRM 接受率为 57.9%,RRSO 接受率为 78.6%。从 GT 到 RRM 的中位时间为 18.4 个月,从 GT 到 RRSO 的中位时间为 10.0 个月。研究人群中每年 BC 的发病率为 1.28%。RRM 与非 RRM 相比,BC 的相对风险降低(RRM 与非 RRM)为 94%。RRSO 与非 RRSO 相比,卵巢癌的风险降低为 100%。

结论

在 24 年的时间里,我们观察到越来越多的女性选择接受 RRS。我们表明,RRS 的时机仍然不理想,尤其是在接受 RRSO 的女性中。RRM 和 RRSO 均对降低相关癌症风险具有显著效果。然而,RRSO 对 BC 没有统计学上显著的保护作用。

相似文献

1
Uptake and efficacy of bilateral risk reducing surgery in unaffected female and carriers.双侧预防性降低风险手术在未受影响的女性和携带者中的应用及效果。
J Med Genet. 2022 Feb;59(2):133-140. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.卵巢癌和乳腺癌基因特异性预防策略的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355324. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55324.
4
Association of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系致病性变异女性行预防性输卵管卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):585-592. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7995.
5
Trends and timing of risk-reducing mastectomy uptake in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚未受影响的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 携带者中降低风险的乳房切除术接受率的趋势和时间。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1900-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.248. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Uptake of screening and risk-reducing recommendations among women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome due to pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants evaluated at a large urban comprehensive cancer center.在一家大型城市综合性癌症中心,对携带致病性 BRCA1/2 变异的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征女性进行了筛查和降低风险建议的评估。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;206(2):261-272. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07283-0. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
7
Use of risk-reducing surgeries in a prospective cohort of 1,499 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.在一个由1499名BRCA1和BRCA2突变携带者组成的前瞻性队列中进行降低风险手术的应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Nov;148(2):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3134-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者的监测和预防策略的成本效益分析。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Mar;25(2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0803-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Salpingectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy Versus Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 Carriers: Three-Year Outcomes of a Prospective Preference Trial.BRCA1/2基因携带者行输卵管切除术加延迟卵巢切除术与输卵管卵巢切除术的比较:一项前瞻性偏好试验的三年结果
BJOG. 2025 May;132(6):782-794. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18075. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
10
Association of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Maximising bias-reduction.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者中绝经前降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险的关联:最大程度减少偏倚。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jun;132:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Patients at Elevated Cancer Risk through a Community-Based Genetic Testing Program.通过一项基于社区的基因检测计划识别癌症风险升高的患者。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17820-w.
2
Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.外科肿瘤学会乳腺疾病部位工作组关于双侧降低风险乳房切除术的声明:适应症、结果和风险
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):899-911. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16484-2. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer.
卵巢癌的筛查与预防。
Med J Aust. 2024 Mar 18;220(5):264-274. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52227. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.卵巢癌和乳腺癌基因特异性预防策略的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355324. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55324.
5
Counselling Framework for Germline and Carriers Considering Risk-Reducing Mastectomy.胚系和携带者考虑降低风险的乳房切除术的咨询框架。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;31(1):350-365. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31010023.
6
Combined population genomic screening for three high-risk conditions in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚三种高危疾病的联合人群基因组筛查:一项建模研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Nov 8;66:102297. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102297. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Risk-reducing surgery for individuals with cancer-predisposing germline pathogenic variants and no personal cancer history: a review of current UK guidelines.具有癌症易感种系致病性变异且无个人癌症史的个体的降低风险手术:对当前英国指南的综述。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Aug;129(3):383-392. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02296-w. Epub 2023 May 31.
8
Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.携带者行降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术后的乳腺癌风险及乳腺癌特异性死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;15(5):1625. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051625.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Surgery for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review.降低乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险手术的成本效益:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;14(24):6117. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246117.
10
The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants in and .卵巢癌晚期诊断避免(ALDO)项目;对 和 种系致病性变异的女性进行的全国性监测计划试点。
J Med Genet. 2023 May;60(5):440-449. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108741. Epub 2022 Nov 1.