Department of Prosthodontics, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India, Phone: +91 8319121386, e-mail:
Department of Prosthodontics, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Aug 1;21(8):835-840.
To investigate by the finite element analysis comparison of stress distribution on the cortical and cancellous bone in an implant-supported yttrium tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP FPD) in four different widely used implant systems under different loading conditions.
Four 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) models of mandible having different implant systems with dimensions 8.0 mm × 5 mm in the second premolar and molar region were developed. In these models, abutment was tightened and 3-unit implant-supported Y-TZP FPD were cemented. A lateral force component of 100 N at 30° to the occlusal plane and a vertical intrusive force component of 250 N were applied to the central fossa of the FDP and the stress on bone around the implant was analyzed by FEA.
In the four implant systems, the maximum stress values on the crestal bone differ for the different implant systems for the two loading conditions applied. In both cases, the maximum stress values on the cortical bone were in ADIN Touareg Closefit WP implants and the maximum stress on the cancellous bone was observed in the Nobel Speedy Groovy implants.
The ADIN Touareg Closefit WP implant system induced maximum stress on the crestal bone in both axial and buccolingual loading. Nobel Speedy Groovy implant system favored more equitable load distribution to the peri-implant crestal bone when compared to the other three implant systems.
From this study, it was found that out of all the implants used for the study, the Nobel Speedy Groovy implant system favored more equitable load distribution due to the platform switch design contrary to the other systems and at the cancellous bone the least load was transferred by the Nobel Active implants due to the reverse buttress thread design and larger thread pitch.
通过有限元分析比较四种不同广泛使用的种植体系统中,在不同载荷条件下,种植体支持的氧化钇四方氧化锆多晶(Y-TZP FPD)的皮质骨和松质骨的应力分布。
建立了具有不同种植体系统的下颌骨的四个三维有限元分析(FEA)模型,在第二前磨牙和磨牙区域的尺寸为 8.0mm×5mm。在这些模型中,将基台拧紧并用 3 个单位的种植体支持的 Y-TZP FPD 进行了粘结。在 FDP 的中央凹处以 30°的咬合面施加侧向力分量为 100N 和垂直侵入力分量为 250N,并通过 FEA 分析了种植体周围骨的应力。
在这四种种植体系统中,对于两种施加的载荷条件,不同种植体系统的骨嵴骨上的最大应力值不同。在两种情况下,皮质骨上的最大应力值均出现在 ADIN Touareg Closefit WP 种植体中,而松质骨上的最大应力值则出现在 Nobel Speedy Groovy 种植体中。
在轴向和颊舌向加载时,ADIN Touareg Closefit WP 种植体系统在骨嵴骨上引起最大的应力。与其他三种种植体系统相比,Nobel Speedy Groovy 种植体系统更有利于将负荷均匀分布到种植体周围的骨嵴上。
从这项研究中可以发现,在所使用的所有种植体中,由于平台转换设计,Nobel Speedy Groovy 种植体系统更有利于将负荷均匀分布,而其他系统则相反,并且由于反向支撑螺纹设计和较大的螺纹间距,Nobel Active 种植体在松质骨上传递的负荷最小。