Li Feng, Xu Fengrui, Li Jianbin, Wang Tao, Bian Li, Zhang Shaohua, Jiang Zefei
Department of Breast Oncology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Breast Oncology, the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):103. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4054.
To compare the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients who experienced disease progression on trastuzumab and lapatinib treatment.
This was a real-world study that included cases of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with trastuzumab and lapatinib failure. One group of patients received pyrotinib monotherapy or combination therapy, whereas the other group received T-DM1 monotherapy. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety.
Between January 2013 and November 2019, 105 patients were enrolled in the pyrotinib group (n=55) or T-DM1 group (n=50). The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 7.3 months) with pyrotinib and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.8 months) with T-DM1 (P=0.044). ORR values were 16.3% and 20.0% in the pyrotinib and T-DM1 groups, respectively (P=0.629); CBR values were 45.5% and 40.0% in the pyrotinib and T-DM1 groups, respectively (P=0.573). Subgroup analysis of those benefitting from lapatinib revealed a median PFS of 8.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 11.4 months) in the pyrotinib group, whereas that of the T-DM1 group was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.8 to 5.0 months, P=0.013). Moreover, the median PFS of patients without liver metastases was 6.9 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.1 months) in the pyrotinib group and 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 5.1 months) in the T-DM1 group (P=0.010). The main common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (98.2%) and nausea (49.1%) in the pyrotinib group and thrombocytopenia (42.0%) and nausea (40.0%) in the T-DM1 group. The percentages of grade 3 to 4 AEs in the pyrotinib and T-DM1 groups were 34.5% and 40.0%, respectively.
The results of this study suggest that patients with HER2-positive MBC with trastuzumab and lapatinib failure can benefit from subsequent pyrotinib treatment and tolerate this treatment well, especially those who have benefited from previous lapatinib treatment or those who have no liver metastasis.
比较吡咯替尼与曲妥珠单抗 emtansine(T-DM1)在接受曲妥珠单抗和拉帕替尼治疗后疾病进展的患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项真实世界研究,纳入了曲妥珠单抗和拉帕替尼治疗失败的转移性乳腺癌(MBC)病例。一组患者接受吡咯替尼单药治疗或联合治疗,而另一组接受 T-DM1 单药治疗。主要研究终点为无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)、临床获益率(CBR)和安全性。
2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 11 月,105 例患者被纳入吡咯替尼组(n = 55)或 T-DM1 组(n = 50)。吡咯替尼组的中位 PFS 为 6.0 个月(95%CI,4.7 至 7.3 个月),T-DM1 组为 4.2 个月(95%CI,3.6 至 4.8 个月)(P = 0.044)。吡咯替尼组和 T-DM1 组的 ORR 值分别为 16.3%和 20.0%(P = 0.629);吡咯替尼组和 T-DM1 组的 CBR 值分别为 45.5%和 40.0%(P = 0.573)。对拉帕替尼治疗有效的患者进行亚组分析显示,吡咯替尼组的中位 PFS 为 8.1 个月(95%CI,4.8 至 11.4 个月),而 T-DM1 组为 4.4 个月(95%CI,3.8 至 5.0 个月,P = 0.013)。此外,吡咯替尼组无肝转移患者的中位 PFS 为 6.9 个月(95%CI,3.7 至 10.1 个月),T-DM1 组为 4.1 个月(95%CI,3.1 至 5.1 个月)(P = 0.010)。主要常见不良事件(AE)在吡咯替尼组为腹泻(98.2%)和恶心(49.1%),在 T-DM1 组为血小板减少(42.0%)和恶心(40.0%)。吡咯替尼组和 T-DM1 组 3 至 4 级 AE 的发生率分别为 34.5%和 40.0%。
本研究结果表明,曲妥珠单抗和拉帕替尼治疗失败的 HER2 阳性 MBC 患者可从后续吡咯替尼治疗中获益且耐受性良好,尤其是那些先前从拉帕替尼治疗中获益或无肝转移的患者。