• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非肝脏相关既往腹部手术对微创肝切除术难度的影响:一项倾向评分匹配对照研究。

Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.

Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08321-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08321-4
PMID:33569726
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The presence of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) has traditionally been considered to add difficulty to and increase risk of complications of laparoscopic procedures. This study aims to analyse the impact of non-liver-related PAS on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After exclusion of patients with concomitant major surgical procedures as well as previous liver resections, 515 consecutive patients undergoing MILR in Singapore General Hospital from 2006 to 2019 were analysed, consisting of 161 MILR in patients with previous abdominal surgery (WPAS) and 354 MILR in patients without previous abdominal surgery (WOPAS). Propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison was performed between WPAS and WOPAS groups. In addition, subgroup analysis was made comparing previous upper or lower abdominal surgery and open versus minimally invasive approach of PAS. Outcomes measured include those associated with operative difficulty such as open conversion rates, operative time, blood loss, as well as morbidity and mortality rates.

RESULTS

MILR outcomes in patients WPAS are not inferior to those WOPAS. Overall open conversion rate was 8.2%, higher in patients WOPAS compared to patients WPAS (11.9% versus 3.5%, p = 0.015). Operating time (p = 0.942), blood loss (p = 0.063), intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.750), length of hospital stay (p = 0.206), morbidity (p = 0.217) and 30- and 90-day mortality (p = 1 & p = 0.367) were comparable between the two groups and subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of MILR in patients with previous non-liver-related abdominal surgery are not inferior to patients without previous abdominal surgery.

摘要

介绍

既往腹部手术(PAS)的存在传统上被认为会增加腹腔镜手术的难度并增加并发症的风险。本研究旨在分析非肝脏相关 PAS 对微创肝切除术(MILR)难度的影响。

材料和方法

排除合并主要手术以及既往肝切除术的患者后,分析了 2006 年至 2019 年在新加坡总医院接受 MILR 的 515 例连续患者,其中 161 例既往腹部手术(WPAS)患者和 354 例无既往腹部手术(WOPAS)患者。WPAS 和 WOPAS 组之间进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较。此外,还进行了亚组分析,比较了既往上腹部或下腹部手术以及 PAS 的开放与微创入路。测量的结果包括与手术难度相关的结果,如中转开腹率、手术时间、出血量以及发病率和死亡率。

结果

WPAS 患者的 MILR 结果并不逊于 WOPAS 患者。总体中转开腹率为 8.2%,WOPAS 患者高于 WPAS 患者(11.9%比 3.5%,p=0.015)。手术时间(p=0.942)、出血量(p=0.063)、术中输血(p=0.750)、住院时间(p=0.206)、发病率(p=0.217)以及 30 天和 90 天死亡率(p=1 和 p=0.367)在两组和亚组分析中均无差异。

结论

既往非肝脏相关腹部手术患者的 MILR 结果并不逊于无既往腹部手术史的患者。

相似文献

1
Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study.非肝脏相关既往腹部手术对微创肝切除术难度的影响:一项倾向评分匹配对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08321-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study.肝硬化对微创肝切除术难度的影响:1:1 粗糙精确匹配对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5231-5238. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Early Morbidity and Mortality after Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Propensity-Score Matched Comparison with Open Resection.微创肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的早期发病率和死亡率:与开放性切除术的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1435-1442. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4016-2. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Impact of Liver Cirrhosis, Severity of Cirrhosis, and Portal Hypertension on the Difficulty and Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Major Liver Resections for Primary Liver Malignancies.肝硬化、肝硬化严重程度和门静脉高压对原发性肝癌腹腔镜和机器人辅助大肝切除术的难度和结果的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;31(1):97-114. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14376-5. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Impact of liver cirrhosis, severity of cirrhosis and portal hypertension on the difficulty of laparoscopic and robotic minor liver resections for primary liver malignancies in the anterolateral segments.肝硬化、肝硬化严重程度和门静脉高压对前外侧段原发性肝癌腹腔镜和机器人辅助小肝切除术难度的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;50(1):107252. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107252. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience.腹腔镜肝切除术:肝硬化和门静脉高压患者的优势是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析及个人经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Oct;30(10):1054-1065. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0408. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients.腹腔镜和机器人辅助小肝切除术中转开放的相关因素及影响:一项国际多中心 10541 例患者研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;31(9):5615-5630. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15498-0. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
8
A propensity-matched study of full laparoscopic versus hand-assisted minimal-invasive liver surgery.一项关于全腹腔镜与手辅助微创肝脏手术的倾向匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2021-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07597-2. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
9
Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis of 224 patients.肝细胞癌的微创与开放肝切除术:224例患者的倾向评分匹配分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 14;408(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02857-w.
10
Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis.微创与开放右前叶切除术及中央肝切除术治疗中央型肝脏恶性肿瘤:一项倾向评分匹配分析
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr;91(4):E174-E182. doi: 10.1111/ans.16719. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in minimally invasive liver surgery.微创肝脏手术的进展
North Clin Istanb. 2024 Nov 20;11(6):586-592. doi: 10.14744/nci.2024.42744. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.既往上腹部手术患者行腹腔镜肝切除术的安全性和可行性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 May;65:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
2
Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.基于指数的 IWATE 标准作为腹腔镜肝切除术改良难度评分系统的验证。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent HCC: Comparison with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent HCC and Laparoscopic Resection for Primary HCC.
复发性肝癌腹腔镜再次肝切除的围手术期结果:与复发性肝癌开腹再次肝切除及原发性肝癌腹腔镜切除的比较
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):878-885. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4828-y.
4
Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: might laparoscopic approach be better in early HCC?腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期和短期手术结果:腹腔镜方法在早期 HCC 中是否更好?
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6372-0. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
5
Effect of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Analysis of Feasibility and Risk Factors for Conversion.既往腹部手术对腹腔镜肝切除术的影响:可行性及中转危险因素分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jul;28(7):785-791. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0071. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Multicenter Observational Study of Adhesion Formation After Open-and Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.多中心观察性研究:结直肠癌开腹手术与腹腔镜手术后的粘连形成。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):743-748. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002175.
7
Review of 103 Cases of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.103例复发性肝细胞癌腹腔镜再次肝切除病例回顾
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):876-881. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0281. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.腹腔镜下复发性肝细胞癌的再次肝切除术
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Oct;87(10):E143-E146. doi: 10.1111/ans.13628. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
Prospective, single-center cohort study analyzing the efficacy of complete laparoscopic resection on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.一项前瞻性单中心队列研究,分析完全腹腔镜切除术对复发性肝细胞癌的疗效。
Chin J Cancer. 2016 Mar 8;35:25. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0088-0.
10
Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing.腹腔镜肝切除术的短期比较效益:9000例且仍在增加。
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):761-77. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413.