• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创联合 PDL/Nd:YAG 激光治疗面部表皮样囊肿的初步研究。

A pilot study of minimal invasion combined PDL/Nd:YAG laser in treating facial epidermoid cyst.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Sep;20(9):2805-2809. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13994. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1111/jocd.13994
PMID:33569899
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and complication of minimal invasion and combined pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser and traditional surgical excision in the treatment of facial epidermoid cyst.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with facial epidermoid cyst aged from 16 to 65 years and cyst diameter ranged from 0.3 to 3.0 cm were treated and followed up. Patients were divided into the minimal invasion and combined pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser treatment group and traditional surgical excision group. All patients were followed up for 12 months including scar size, recurrence rate, incidence of complications, and patient global satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean operative time in the minimal invasion and combined pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser treatment was 15.23 ± 7.02 minutes, which is significantly shorter than that of surgical excision (27.26 ± 10.12 minutes, P < .05). After 12 months, the average scar size in minimal invasion and combined pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser group was 0.54 ± 0.35 cm, while that of traditional surgical excision group was 1.77 ± 0.81 cm (P < .05). No statistical difference was found between two groups in the wounds split, hematoma, early and late recurrence rates (P > .05), while the patients' global satisfaction in the pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser group is much higher than that of the traditional surgical excision group.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of minimal invasion and combined pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser is effective and safe for medium-size facial epidermoid cysts. For facial epidermoid cyst ranging for 0.3 cm to 3.0 cm, considering the cosmetic factors, minimal invasion and combined pulsed dye laser/Nd:YAG laser should be particularly recommended.

摘要

目的

比较微创联合脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光与传统手术切除治疗面部表皮样囊肿的疗效和并发症。

方法

共收治 100 例 16-65 岁面部表皮样囊肿患者,囊肿直径 0.3-3.0cm。患者分为微创联合脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗组和传统手术切除组。所有患者均随访 12 个月,包括瘢痕大小、复发率、并发症发生率和患者总体满意度。

结果

微创联合脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗组的平均手术时间为 15.23±7.02 分钟,明显短于手术切除组(27.26±10.12 分钟,P<.05)。12 个月后,微创联合脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光组平均瘢痕大小为 0.54±0.35cm,传统手术切除组为 1.77±0.81cm(P<.05)。两组在伤口裂开、血肿、早期和晚期复发率方面无统计学差异(P>.05),但脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光组患者总体满意度明显高于传统手术切除组。

结论

微创联合脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗中等大小面部表皮样囊肿有效且安全。对于 0.3-3.0cm 的面部表皮样囊肿,考虑到美容因素,微创联合脉冲染料激光/钕:钇铝石榴石激光应特别推荐。

相似文献

1
A pilot study of minimal invasion combined PDL/Nd:YAG laser in treating facial epidermoid cyst.微创联合 PDL/Nd:YAG 激光治疗面部表皮样囊肿的初步研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Sep;20(9):2805-2809. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13994. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Comparative effectiveness of nonpurpuragenic 595-nm pulsed dye laser and microsecond 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for treatment of diffuse facial erythema: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.非致紫癜性 595nm 脉冲染料激光和微秒 1064nm 钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗弥漫性面部红斑的疗效比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Sep;69(3):438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 17.
3
Pulsed dye laser versus long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloid: A comparative randomized split-scar trial.脉冲染料激光与长脉冲Nd:YAG激光治疗增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的比较:一项随机对照双盲试验。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Aug;18(4):208-12. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2015.1114648. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Comparative effectiveness of purpuragenic 595 nm pulsed dye laser versus sequential emission of 595 nm pulsed dye laser and 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser: a double-blind randomized controlled study.595纳米紫癜性脉冲染料激光与595纳米脉冲染料激光和1064纳米Nd:YAG激光序贯发射的比较疗效:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2019 Mar;28(1):1-5.
5
Comparing the efficacy of pulsed dye laser, Q-Switched Nd-YAG, CO2, and combined CO and Q-Switched Nd-YAG lasers for the treatment of cutaneous macular amyloidosis.比较脉冲染料激光、调Q Nd:YAG激光、CO2激光以及联合CO与调Q Nd:YAG激光治疗皮肤斑状淀粉样变的疗效。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Mar;32(2):258-260. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1654071. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
6
Pulsed dye laser versus long pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of angiokeratoma of Fordyce: A randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study.脉冲染料激光与长脉冲钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗福代斯血管角皮瘤的随机、对照、观察者盲法研究
J Dermatolog Treat. 2016;27(3):270-4. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1094180. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
7
Split lesion randomized comparative study between long pulsed Nd:YAG laser 532 and 1,064 nm in treatment of facial port-wine stain.长脉冲532nm和1064nm Nd:YAG激光治疗面部葡萄酒色斑的分割病变随机对照研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):852-858. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22584. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
Pulsed dye laser versus Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of plantar warts: a comparative study.脉冲染料激光与Nd:YAG激光治疗跖疣的对比研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2014 May;29(3):1111-6. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1479-y. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Comparison of pulsed dye laser versus combined pulsed dye laser and Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris.脉冲染料激光与脉冲染料激光联合Nd:YAG激光治疗炎性寻常痤疮的比较
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017 Jun;19(3):149-159. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1262962. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
Treatment of nail psoriasis with pulsed dye laser versus combined pulsed dye and Nd:YAG lasers-An intrapatient left-to-right study.脉冲染料激光与脉冲染料激光联合Nd:YAG激光治疗甲银屑病——一项患者自身左右对照研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Jul;54(5):688-692. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23537. Epub 2022 Mar 15.