Suppr超能文献

与护士对决策参与认知相关的因素探究

An Exploration of Factors Associated With Nurses' Perceptions of Decisional Involvement.

作者信息

Promes Jennifer, Barnason Susan

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Magnet Program Director (Ms Promes), Nurse Scientist (Dr Barnason), Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha.

出版信息

J Nurs Adm. 2021 Mar 1;51(3):141-148. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000985.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate nurses' perceptions of decisional involvement (DI).

BACKGROUND

Decisional involvement is a measure or gauge of nurses' perceived shared leadership. There has been limited research examining factors associated with actual and preferred DI.

METHODS

A descriptive, observational study design was used. A total of 189 RNs completed the Decisional Involvement Scale and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation Scale. Nurses' preferred DI (DI-P) and actual DI (DI-A) were analyzed, and DI total and subscale scores were compared based on nurses' demographic and clinical practice characteristics.

RESULTS

The DI-A and DI-P total scores were significantly different, including subscales for DI-A compared with DI-P score. Dissonance scores by subscale were highest for recruitment, governance, and support. Unit-based council (UBC) participants had significantly higher actual DI, compared with non-UBC participants. Nurses' perceptions of implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) was not significantly different by low versus high EBP implementation; nor were the scores significantly correlated with their DI-A or DI-P scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate nurses' perceptions of DI-A and DI-P. This study provided further examination of the differences and interrelationships between DI and nurses' demographic and clinical practice characteristics. Dissonance DI scores provide opportunities for targeting interventions to engage nurses in shared leadership.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估护士对决策参与度(DI)的认知。

背景

决策参与度是衡量护士所感知的共享领导力的一种指标。关于与实际和偏好的决策参与度相关因素的研究有限。

方法

采用描述性观察研究设计。共有189名注册护士完成了决策参与度量表和循证实践实施量表。分析了护士的偏好决策参与度(DI-P)和实际决策参与度(DI-A),并根据护士的人口统计学和临床实践特征比较了决策参与度总分及各子量表得分。

结果

DI-A和DI-P总分存在显著差异,包括DI-A各子量表得分与DI-P得分相比。在招聘、治理和支持方面,各子量表的不一致得分最高。与非单位委员会(UBC)参与者相比,UBC参与者的实际决策参与度显著更高。护士对实施循证实践(EBP)的认知在低EBP实施组和高EBP实施组之间没有显著差异;其得分与DI-A或DI-P得分也没有显著相关性。

结论

研究结果表明了护士对DI-A和DI-P的认知。本研究进一步考察了决策参与度与护士人口统计学和临床实践特征之间的差异及相互关系。不一致的决策参与度得分提供了针对干预措施的机会,以使护士参与共享领导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验