University of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology, 361 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Biol Psychol. 2021 Mar;160:108044. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108044. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
Emotional functioning can be assessed across multiple levels of analysis (e.g., subjective, physiological). The degree of concordance/discordance across such indices may mark psychopathology risk. The current study assessed associations between physiological and subjective indices of emotional responding among drinkers, with (n = 39) and without (n = 42) borderline personality disorder. Subjective changes in affect were assessed by calculating difference scores on the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule, administered before and following a lab-based stress task. Physiological dysregulation was indexed by respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) reactivity. We created Discordance Index scores to examine the direction and magnitude of misalignment. More frequent alcohol use was associated with greater discordance between RSA and positive affect changes (β = -0.07, p-value = 0.009). Findings were confirmed with a response surface modeling analysis. Results highlight that individuals with greater discordance between indices of emotional responding may be at elevated risk for frequent alcohol use.
情绪功能可以在多个分析层面上进行评估(例如主观、生理)。这些指标之间的一致性/不一致程度可能标志着精神病理学风险。本研究评估了饮酒者(n=39)和无边缘型人格障碍者(n=42)之间生理和主观情绪反应指标之间的关联。通过计算正性和负性情感量表在实验室应激任务前后的差值得分来评估情感变化。呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)反应性指标反映了生理失调。我们创建了不和谐指数评分来检查不匹配的方向和程度。更频繁的饮酒与 RSA 和正性情绪变化之间更大的不和谐(β=-0.07,p 值=0.009)有关。这些结果通过响应面建模分析得到了证实。研究结果表明,在情绪反应指标之间存在更大不和谐的个体可能面临更高的频繁饮酒风险。