Department of General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch.
Biostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, University of Otago, Christchurch.
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun 24;71(708):e538-e546. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0797. Print 2021 Jul.
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a common cause of chronic pain. Analgesics that are currently available have limited efficacy and may be poorly tolerated. Tricyclic antidepressants are used as analgesics for other chronic conditions, but they have not been evaluated as analgesics in OA. AIM: To investigate the analgesic efficacy of nortriptyline in people with knee OA. DESIGN AND SETTING: A two-arm, parallel-group, 1:1, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in Christchurch, New Zealand. METHOD: Participants were recruited from orthopaedic outpatient clinics, primary care, and through public advertising. Adults with knee OA and a pain score of ≥20 points on the 50-point Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale were randomised to receive either nortriptyline or identical placebo for 14 weeks. The primary outcome was knee pain at 14 weeks measured using the WOMAC pain subscale. Secondary outcomes included: function; stiffness; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, opioid, and/or paracetamol use; each participant's global assessment; and adverse effects at 14 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 205 randomised participants, 201 (98.0%) completed follow-up at 14 weeks. The baseline-adjusted mean WOMAC pain subscale score at week 14 was 6.2 points lower (95% confidence interval = -0.26 to 12.6, = 0.06) in the nortriptyline arm versus the placebo arm. Differences in secondary outcomes generally favoured the nortriptyline arm, but were small and unlikely to be clinically relevant. However, the following were all more commonly reported by participants taking nortriptyline than those taking a placebo: dry mouth (86.9% versus 51.0%, respectively, <0.001), constipation (58.6% versus 30.4%, respectively, <0.001), and sweating (31.3% versus 20.6%, respectively, = 0.033). CONCLUSION: This study suggests nortriptyline does not significantly reduce pain in people with knee OA. The adverse effect profile was as expected.
背景:膝骨关节炎(OA)是慢性疼痛的常见原因。目前可用的镇痛药疗效有限,且可能耐受性差。三环类抗抑郁药被用作其他慢性疾病的镇痛药,但尚未作为 OA 的镇痛药进行评估。
目的:研究曲普瑞林在膝骨关节炎患者中的镇痛疗效。
设计和设置:新西兰克赖斯特彻奇的一项双臂、平行组、1:1、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
方法:参与者从矫形门诊、初级保健和公开广告中招募。患有膝 OA 且 Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)疼痛子量表评分≥20 分的成年人被随机分为接受曲普瑞林或相同安慰剂治疗 14 周。主要结局是 14 周时使用 WOMAC 疼痛子量表测量的膝关节疼痛。次要结局包括:功能;僵硬;非甾体抗炎药、阿片类药物和/或扑热息痛的使用;每位参与者的总体评估;以及 14 周时的不良反应。
结果:在 205 名随机参与者中,有 201 名(98.0%)在 14 周时完成了随访。与安慰剂组相比,第 14 周时曲普瑞林组 WOMAC 疼痛子量表评分平均降低 6.2 分(95%置信区间=-0.26 至 12.6, =0.06)。次要结局的差异通常有利于曲普瑞林组,但幅度较小,不太可能具有临床意义。然而,服用曲普瑞林的参与者比服用安慰剂的参与者更常报告以下情况:口干(分别为 86.9%和 51.0%,<0.001)、便秘(分别为 58.6%和 30.4%,<0.001)和出汗(分别为 31.3%和 20.6%, =0.033)。
结论:本研究表明曲普瑞林不能显著减轻膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛。不良反应谱符合预期。
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-2-25
JAMA Intern Med. 2018-11-1