• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对初用强效阿片类药物的骨关节炎患者,为期6个月的随机、安慰剂对照研究,评估低剂量丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂7天治疗的有效性和耐受性。

A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naïve to potent opioids.

作者信息

Breivik Harald, Ljosaa Tone Marte, Stengaard-Pedersen Kristian, Persson Jan, Aro Hannu, Villumsen John, Tvinnemose Dorthe

机构信息

University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Department of Pain Management, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway.

Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2010 Jul 1;1(3):122-141. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.035.

DOI:10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.035
PMID:29913983
Abstract

Objective Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) pain often have insufficient pain relief from non-opioid analgesics. The aim of this trial was to study efficacy and tolerability of a low dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal delivery system, added to a NSAID or coxib regimen, in opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe OA pain. Methods A 6 months randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study at 19 centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, in which OA patients (>40 years) with at least moderate radiographic OA changes and at least moderate pain in a hip and/or knee while on a NSAID or a coxib were randomised to a 7-day buprenorphine patch (n = 100) or an identical placebo patch (n = 99). The initial patch delivered buprenorphine 5 μg/h. This was titrated to 10 or 20 μg/h, as needed. Rescue analgesic was paracetamol 0.5-4 g daily. Statistical analysis of outcome data was mainly with a general linear model, with treatment as factor, the primary joint of osteoarthritis, baseline scores, and season as covariates. Results Most patients had OA-radiographic grade II (moderate) or grade III (severe), only 8 in each group had very severe OA (grade IV). The median buprenorphine dose was 10 μg/h. 31 buprenorphine-treated patients and 2 placebo-treated patients withdrew because of side effects. Lack of effect caused 12 placebo-treated and 7 buprenorphine-treated patients to withdraw. The differences in effects between treatments: Daytime pain on movement, recorded every evening on a 0-10 numeric rating scale decreased significantly more (P = 0.029) in the buprenorphine group. Patients' Global Impression of Change at the end of the double blind period was significantly improved in the buprenorphine group (P = 0.017). The chosen primary effect outcome measure, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index for Pain (P = 0.061), and secondary outcome measures, the WOMAC OA score for functional abilities (P = 0.055), and the WOMAC total score (P = 0.059) indicated more effects from buprenorphine than placebo, but these differences were not statistically significant. In a post-hoc, subgroup analysis with the 16 patients with radiographic grad IV (very severe) excluded, WOMAC OA Index for Pain was significantly (P = 0.039) reduced by buprenorphine, compared with placebo. WOMAC OA score for stiffness and the amount of rescue medication taken did not differ. Sleep disturbance, quality of sleep, and quality of life improved in both groups. Side effects: Typical opioid side effects caused withdrawal at a median of 110 [corrected] days before completing the 168 days double blind trial in 1/3 of the buprenorphine group. Mostly mild local skin reactions occurred equally often (1/3) in both groups. Conclusions Although the 24 hours WOMAC OsteoArthritis Index of pain was not statistically significantly superior to placebo, day-time movement-related pain and patients' global impression of improvement at the end of the 6-months double blind treatment period were significantly better in patients treated with buprenorphine compared with placebo. Opioid side effects caused 1/3 of the buprenorphine-patients to withdraw before the end of the 6-months double blind study period. Implications A low dose 7-days buprenorphine patch at 5-20 μg/h is a possible means of pain relief in about 2/3 of elderly osteoarthritis patients, in whom pain is opioid-sensitive, surgery is not possible, NSAIDs and coxibs are not recommended, and paracetamol in tolerable doses is not effective enough. Vigilant focus on and management of opioid side effects are essential.

摘要

目的 骨关节炎(OA)疼痛患者使用非阿片类镇痛药往往无法充分缓解疼痛。本试验旨在研究在未使用过阿片类药物、中度至重度OA疼痛患者中,在非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)或环氧化酶抑制剂(coxib)治疗方案基础上,添加低剂量7天丁丙诺啡透皮给药系统的疗效和耐受性。方法 在丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的19个中心进行了一项为期6个月的随机、双盲、平行组研究,将年龄>40岁、在服用NSAID或coxib时至少有中度影像学OA改变且髋部和/或膝部至少有中度疼痛的OA患者随机分为7天丁丙诺啡贴剂组(n = 100)或相同的安慰剂贴剂组(n = 99)。初始贴剂释放丁丙诺啡的速度为5μg/h,必要时可滴定至10或20μg/h。解救镇痛药为对乙酰氨基酚,每日0.5 - 4g。结局数据的统计分析主要采用一般线性模型,将治疗作为因素,骨关节炎的主要关节、基线评分和季节作为协变量。结果 大多数患者的OA影像学分级为II级(中度)或III级(重度),每组仅有8例为极重度OA(IV级)。丁丙诺啡的中位剂量为10μg/h。31例接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者和2例接受安慰剂治疗的患者因副作用退出。无效导致12例接受安慰剂治疗的患者和7例接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者退出。治疗效果差异:采用0 - 10数字评分量表每天晚上记录的白天运动时疼痛,丁丙诺啡组显著降低更多(P = 0.029)。双盲期结束时,丁丙诺啡组患者的总体变化印象显著改善(P = 0.017)。所选择的主要疗效指标,即西安大略和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)OA疼痛指数(P = 0.061),以及次要疗效指标,即WOMAC OA功能能力评分(P = 0.055)和WOMAC总分(P = 0.059)显示,丁丙诺啡的效果优于安慰剂,但这些差异无统计学意义。在一项排除了16例影像学IV级(极重度)患者的事后亚组分析中,与安慰剂相比,丁丙诺啡显著降低了WOMAC OA疼痛指数(P = 0.039)。WOMAC OA僵硬评分和所服用的解救药物量无差异。两组患者的睡眠障碍、睡眠质量和生活质量均有所改善。副作用:典型的阿片类药物副作用导致丁丙诺啡组1/3的患者在完成168天双盲试验前中位110[校正]天退出。两组中大多为轻度局部皮肤反应的发生率相同(均为1/3)。结论 尽管24小时WOMAC骨关节炎疼痛指数在统计学上并不显著优于安慰剂,但与安慰剂相比,丁丙诺啡治疗的患者在6个月双盲治疗期结束时白天与运动相关的疼痛以及患者的总体改善印象明显更好。阿片类药物副作用导致1/3的丁丙诺啡治疗患者在6个月双盲研究期结束前退出。意义 低剂量5 - 20μg/h的7天丁丙诺啡贴剂可能是约2/3老年骨关节炎患者缓解疼痛的一种方法,这些患者对阿片类药物敏感、无法进行手术、不推荐使用NSAID和coxib,且可耐受剂量的对乙酰氨基酚效果不够显著。密切关注和管理阿片类药物副作用至关重要。

相似文献

1
A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naïve to potent opioids.一项针对初用强效阿片类药物的骨关节炎患者,为期6个月的随机、安慰剂对照研究,评估低剂量丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂7天治疗的有效性和耐受性。
Scand J Pain. 2010 Jul 1;1(3):122-141. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.035.
2
Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study.低剂量经皮丁丙诺啡贴剂(5、10和20微克/小时)与缓释曲马多片(75、100、150和200毫克)治疗慢性骨关节炎疼痛患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期12周的随机、开放标签、对照、平行组非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):503-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.001.
3
Is buprenorphine transdermal patch equally safe and effective in younger and elderly patients with osteoarthritis-related pain? Results of an age-group controlled study.丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂在年轻和老年骨关节炎相关疼痛患者中是否同样安全有效?一项年龄组对照研究的结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Apr;30(4):575-87. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.873714. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
A 2-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase III trial comparing the efficacy of oxymorphone extended release and placebo in adults with pain associated with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.一项为期2周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量范围研究的III期试验,比较了羟考酮缓释剂与安慰剂对患有髋部或膝部骨关节炎相关疼痛的成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):352-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.008.
5
Transdermal buprenorphine patches applied in a 4-day regimen versus a 3-day regimen: a single-site, Phase III, randomized, open-label, crossover comparison.透皮丁丙诺啡贴剂4天给药方案与3天给药方案的比较:一项单中心、III期、随机、开放标签、交叉对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Aug;29(8):1591-606. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.001.
6
Efficacy and safety of E-OA-07 in moderate to severe symptoms of osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.E-OA-07 治疗中重度骨关节炎症状的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照研究。
Am J Ther. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):170-7. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318209df49.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain: results of a 6-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority analysis.每日一次的奥施康定(OROS 氢吗啡酮)与每日两次的缓释羟考酮治疗慢性中重度骨关节炎疼痛患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 6 周的随机、开放标签、非劣效性分析结果
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):874-888. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.016.
8
Transdermal buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain: results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.透皮丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛:一项III期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
Clin Ther. 2004 Nov;26(11):1808-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11.008.
9
Randomized clinical trial evaluating transdermal Ibuprofen for moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis.随机临床试验评估透皮布洛芬治疗中重度膝骨关节炎。
Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):E749-62.
10
Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with inadequately controlled chronic pain related to cancer and other disorders: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.经皮丁丙诺啡对癌症及其他疾病相关慢性疼痛控制不佳患者的镇痛疗效和耐受性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Clin Ther. 2003 Jan;25(1):150-68. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)90019-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding Horizons of Buprenorphine: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Its Pharmacological Properties and Clinical Applications in Chronic Pain.丁丙诺啡的拓展视野:关于其药理特性及在慢性疼痛中临床应用的全面叙述性综述
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun 22. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00753-3.
2
Development and Validation of a Treatment Algorithm for Osteoarthritis Pain Management in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis.终末期肾病血液透析患者骨关节炎疼痛管理治疗算法的开发与验证
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024 May 13;11:20543581241249365. doi: 10.1177/20543581241249365. eCollection 2024.
3
Cannabis for medical use versus opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
医用大麻与阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌痛的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):e068182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068182.
4
Opioid Prescribing in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.老年人阿片类药物处方:一项系统评价
J Pharm Technol. 2020 Feb;36(1):28-40. doi: 10.1177/8755122519867975. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Pain management in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease.慢性肾脏病和终末期肾病患者的疼痛管理。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020 Nov;29(6):671-680. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000646.
6
Analgesic impact of buprenorphine transdermal patch in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial protocol.丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂在全髋关节置换术中的镇痛作用:一项随机对照试验方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20405. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020405.
7
Safety And Efficacy Of The Unique Opioid Buprenorphine For The Treatment Of Chronic Pain.新型阿片类药物丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛的安全性与有效性
J Pain Res. 2019 Dec 13;12:3299-3317. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S231948. eCollection 2019.
8
Pain Control in Latin America: The Optimized Role of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Cancer and Noncancer Pain.拉丁美洲的疼痛控制:丁丙诺啡在癌症和非癌症疼痛治疗中的优化作用
Pain Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):187-201. doi: 10.1007/s40122-019-0126-0. Epub 2019 May 17.
9
Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.慢性非癌痛阿片类药物治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2448-2460. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18472.
10
Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system.在使用丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂治疗中重度慢性疼痛时,使用即释阿片类药物作为补充镇痛剂。
J Pain Res. 2017 May 24;10:1255-1263. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S132595. eCollection 2017.