• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有意中毒动物检测中的偏差:来自现场实验的公共卫生和保护意义。

Biases in the Detection of Intentionally Poisoned Animals: Public Health and Conservation Implications from a Field Experiment.

机构信息

Department of Applied Biology, Miguel Hernández University, Avda. de la Universidad, s/n, E-03202 Elche, Spain.

Department of Zoology, University of Granada, Avda. de Fuente Nueva, s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031201.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031201
PMID:33572837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908198/
Abstract

Intentional poisoning is a global wildlife problem and an overlooked risk factor for public health. Managing poisoning requires unbiased and high-quality data through wildlife monitoring protocols, which are largely lacking. We herein evaluated the biases associated with current monitoring programmes of wildlife poisoning in Spain. We compared the national poisoning database for the 1990-2015 period with information obtained from a field experiment during which we used camera-traps to detect the species that consumed non-poisoned baits. Our findings suggest that the detection rate of poisoned animals is species-dependent: Several animal groups (e.g., domestic mammalian carnivores and vultures) tended to be over-represented in the poisoning national database, while others (e.g., corvids and small mammals) were underrepresented. As revealed by the GLMM analyses, the probability of a given species being overrepresented was higher for heaviest, aerial, and cryptic species. In conclusion, we found that monitoring poisoned fauna based on heterogeneous sources may produce important biases in detection rates; thus, such information should be used with caution by managers and policy-makers. Our findings may guide to future search efforts aimed to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the intentional wildlife poisoning problem.

摘要

蓄意中毒是全球性的野生动物问题,也是被忽视的公共健康风险因素。管理中毒需要通过野生动物监测协议获得公正和高质量的数据,但目前这种协议在很大程度上是缺乏的。本文评估了西班牙当前野生动物中毒监测计划中存在的偏见。我们将 1990-2015 年期间的国家中毒数据库与在野外实验中获得的信息进行了比较,在该实验中,我们使用相机陷阱来检测食用未中毒诱饵的物种。我们的研究结果表明,中毒动物的检出率取决于物种:一些动物群体(如家养的哺乳类食肉动物和秃鹫)在国家中毒数据库中过度代表,而其他群体(如鸦科和小型哺乳动物)则代表不足。GLMM 分析表明,给定物种过度代表的概率与其体重、飞行和隐匿性等特征有关。总之,我们发现基于异质来源监测中毒动物可能会导致检测率出现重要偏差;因此,管理者和决策者在使用此类信息时应谨慎。我们的研究结果可能为未来旨在更全面了解蓄意野生动物中毒问题的搜索工作提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/2cf206364f8d/ijerph-18-01201-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/abbf6b889e21/ijerph-18-01201-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/4aa70687a50c/ijerph-18-01201-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/2cf206364f8d/ijerph-18-01201-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/abbf6b889e21/ijerph-18-01201-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/4aa70687a50c/ijerph-18-01201-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca65/7908198/2cf206364f8d/ijerph-18-01201-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Biases in the Detection of Intentionally Poisoned Animals: Public Health and Conservation Implications from a Field Experiment.有意中毒动物检测中的偏差:来自现场实验的公共卫生和保护意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031201.
2
The power of poison: pesticide poisoning of Africa's wildlife.毒药的威力:非洲野生动物的农药中毒
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Aug;1322:1-20. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12405. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
3
Use of poisoned baits against wildlife. A retrospective 17-year study in the natural environment of Extremadura (Spain).使用毒饵防治野生动物。在埃斯特雷马杜拉(西班牙)的自然环境中进行的一项回顾性 17 年研究。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Jun 15;303:119098. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119098. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
4
Implications of Ebola virus disease on wildlife conservation in Nigeria.埃博拉病毒病对尼日利亚野生动物保护的影响。
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Oct 11;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2015.22.1.6617. eCollection 2015.
5
Awareness of environmental legislation as a deterrent for wildlife crime: A case with Masaai pastoralists, poison use and the Kenya Wildlife Act.意识到环境立法对野生动物犯罪的威慑作用:以肯尼亚马赛游牧民、毒药使用和《肯尼亚野生动物法案》为例。
Ambio. 2022 Jul;51(7):1632-1642. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01695-8. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
6
Animal mortality and illegal poison bait use in Greece.希腊的动物死亡率和非法毒饵使用情况。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 25;190(8):488. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6838-5.
7
Continued implication of the banned pesticides carbofuran and aldicarb in the poisoning of domestic and wild animals of the Canary Islands (Spain).卡巴呋喃和涕灭威等禁用农药在西班牙加那利群岛的家养和野生动物中毒事件中的持续影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1093-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.093. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
8
Epidemiology of animal poisoning: An overview on the features and spatio-temporal distribution of the phenomenon in the north-eastern Italian regions.动物中毒流行病学:意大利东北部地区该现象的特征及时空分布概述
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:440-448. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Spatial and temporal interactions between livestock and wildlife in South Central Spain assessed by camera traps.利用相机陷阱评估西班牙中南部家畜和野生动物的时空相互作用。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Combining ranger records and biogeographical models to identify the current and potential distribution of an expanding mesocarnivore in southern Europe.结合游骑兵记录和生物地理模型,确定南欧不断扩张的中型食肉动物的当前和潜在分布。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 10;946:174216. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174216. Epub 2024 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
How do invasive predators and their native prey respond to prescribed fire?入侵性捕食者及其本地猎物对规定火烧会作何反应?
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 22;14(5):e11450. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11450. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Editorial: Animal Poisoning and Biomarkers of Toxicity.社论:动物中毒与毒性生物标志物
Front Vet Sci. 2022 May 4;9:891483. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.891483. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct evidence of poison-driven widespread population decline in a wild vertebrate.毒物驱动野生脊椎动物广泛种群衰退的直接证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 14;117(28):16418-16423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922355117. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Local context and environment as risk factors for acute poisoning in animals in northwest Italy.意大利西北部地区的局部环境和地域因素与动物急性中毒的关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 20;709:136016. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136016. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
Protect African vultures from poison.保护非洲秃鹫免受毒害。
Science. 2019 Sep 13;365(6458):1089-1090. doi: 10.1126/science.aay7945.
4
Scavenging in the Anthropocene: Human impact drives vertebrate scavenger species richness at a global scale.人类世的清道夫行为:人类活动对全球范围内的脊椎动物清道夫物种丰富度产生影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Sep;25(9):3005-3017. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14708. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Illegal killing of birds in Europe continues.欧洲非法捕杀鸟类的现象仍在继续。
Science. 2019 Mar 15;363(6432):1161. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7516.
6
Mismeasured mortality: correcting estimates of wolf poaching in the United States.误测的死亡率:校正美国狼偷猎情况的估计
J Mammal. 2017 Oct 3;98(5):1256-1264. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx052. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
Carnivore carcasses are avoided by carnivores.食肉动物会避开食肉动物的尸体。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Sep;86(5):1179-1191. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12714. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
VIGILANCE POISON: Illegal poisoning and lead intoxication are the main factors affecting avian scavenger survival in the Pyrenees (France).警惕中毒:非法投毒和铅中毒是影响比利牛斯山脉(法国)鸟类食腐动物生存的主要因素。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Aug;118:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
The power of poison: pesticide poisoning of Africa's wildlife.毒药的威力:非洲野生动物的农药中毒
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Aug;1322:1-20. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12405. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
10
Baits, budget cuts: a deadly mix.诱饵,预算削减:致命组合。
Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):192. doi: 10.1126/science.338.6104.192-a.