Suppr超能文献

一种改良的搜索、凝血和夹闭方法在使用和不使用聚乙醇酸片及纤维蛋白胶的情况下预防胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后延迟出血的可行性。

Feasibility of a modified search, coagulation, and clipping method with and without the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

作者信息

Abiko Satoshi, Oda Soichiro, Meno Akimitsu, Shido Akane, Yoshida Sonoe, Yoshikawa Ayumu, Harada Kazuaki, Kawagishi Naoki, Sano Itsuki, Oda Hisashi, Miyagishima Takuto

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01539-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methods have been developed for preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (GESD). However, none of the methods can completely prevent DB. We hypothesized that DB could be prevented by a modified search, coagulation, and clipping (MSCC) method for patients at low risk for DB and by combining the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue with the MSCC method (PMSCC method) for patients at high risk for DB (antibleeding [ABI] strategy). This study assessed the technical feasibility of this novel strategy.

METHOD

We investigated 123 lesions in 121 consecutive patients who underwent GESD in Kushiro Rosai Hospital between April 2018 and January 2020. The decision for continuation or cessation of antithrombotic agents was based on the Guidelines for Gastroenterological Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Treatment.

RESULTS

Oral antithrombotic agents were administered to 28 patients (22.8%). The en bloc R0 resection rate was 98.4%. The MSCC method and the PMSCC method for preventing DB were performed in 114 and 9 lesions, respectively. The median time of the MSCC method was 16 min, and the median speed (the resection area divided by the time of method used) was 3.6 cm/10 min. The median time of the PMSCC method was 59 min, and the median speed was 1.3 cm/10 min. The only delayed procedural adverse event was DB in 1 (0.8%) of the 123 lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABI strategy is feasible for preventing DB both in patients at low risk and in those at high risk for DB after GESD, whereas the PMSCC method may be necessary for reduction of time.

摘要

背景

已开发出预防胃内镜黏膜下剥离术(GESD)后延迟出血(DB)的方法。然而,这些方法均无法完全预防DB。我们推测,对于DB低风险患者,改良的探查、凝血和夹闭(MSCC)方法可预防DB;对于DB高风险患者,将聚乙醇酸片和纤维蛋白胶与MSCC方法联合使用(PMSCC方法)可预防DB(抗出血[ABI]策略)。本研究评估了这一新型策略的技术可行性。

方法

我们调查了2018年4月至2020年1月间在钏路罗萨医院接受GESD的121例连续患者中的123个病变。抗血栓药物的继续使用或停用决策基于抗血栓治疗患者的胃肠内镜检查指南。

结果

28例患者(22.8%)接受了口服抗血栓药物治疗。整块R0切除率为98.4%。分别对114个和9个病变采用MSCC方法和PMSCC方法预防DB。MSCC方法的中位时间为16分钟,中位速度(切除面积除以所用方法时间)为3.6 cm/10分钟。PMSCC方法的中位时间为59分钟,中位速度为1.3 cm/10分钟。唯一的延迟性手术不良事件是123个病变中的1个(0.8%)发生DB。

结论

ABI策略在预防GESD后DB低风险和高风险患者中均可行,而PMSCC方法对于缩短时间可能是必要的。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition).《日本胃癌治疗指南2018(第5版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验