Suppr超能文献

与三维运动分析相比,智能手机应用程序测量髋关节旋转的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of smartphone applications for measurement of hip rotation, compared with three-dimensional motion analysis.

作者信息

Ganokroj Phob, Sompornpanich Nuchanun, Kerdsomnuek Pichitpol, Vanadurongwan Bavornrat, Lertwanich Pisit

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkok Noi, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 11;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03995-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measurement of hip rotation is a crucial clinical parameter for the identification of hip problems and the monitoring of symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of two smartphone applications is valid and reliable for the measurement of hip rotation.

METHODS

An experimental, cross-sectional study was undertaken to assess passive hip internal and external rotation in three positions by two examiners. The hip rotational angles were measured by a smartphone clinometer application in the sitting and prone positions, and by a smartphone compass application in the supine position; their results were compared with those of the standard, three-dimensional, motion analysis system. The validities and inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the smartphone applications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study involved 24 participants. The validities were good to excellent for the internal rotation angles in all positions (ICC 0.81-0.94), good for the external rotation angles in the prone position (ICC 0.79), and fair for the sitting and supine positions (ICC 0.70-0.73). The measurement of the hip internal rotation in the supine position had the highest ICC value of 0.94 (0.91, 0.96). The two smartphone applications showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, but good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability for only three of the six positions (two other positions had fair reliability, while one position demonstrated poor reliability).

CONCLUSIONS

The two smartphone applications have good-to-excellent validity and intra-rater reliability, but only fair-to-good inter-rater reliability for the measurement of the hip rotational angle. The most valid hip rotational position in this study was the supine IR angle measurement, while the lowest validity was the ER angle measurement in the sitting position. The smartphone application is one of the practical measurements in hip rotational angles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Number 20181022003 at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th ) which was retrospectively registered at 2018-10-18 15:30:29.

摘要

背景

髋关节旋转测量是识别髋关节问题和监测症状的关键临床参数。本研究的目的是确定使用两款智能手机应用程序测量髋关节旋转是否有效且可靠。

方法

进行了一项实验性横断面研究,由两名检查者在三个位置评估髋关节被动内旋和外旋。通过智能手机测斜仪应用程序在坐位和俯卧位测量髋关节旋转角度,通过智能手机指南针应用程序在仰卧位测量;将其结果与标准的三维运动分析系统的结果进行比较。评估了智能手机应用程序的有效性以及检查者间和检查者内的可靠性。

结果

该研究纳入了24名参与者。所有位置的内旋角度有效性良好至优秀(组内相关系数[ICC]为0.81 - 0.94),俯卧位的外旋角度有效性良好(ICC为0.79),坐位和仰卧位的外旋角度有效性一般(ICC为0.70 - 0.73)。仰卧位髋关节内旋测量的ICC值最高,为0.94(0.91,0.96)。两款智能手机应用程序显示出良好至优秀的检查者内可靠性,但在六个位置中只有三个位置具有良好至优秀的检查者间可靠性(另外两个位置可靠性一般,一个位置可靠性较差)。

结论

两款智能手机应用程序在测量髋关节旋转角度方面具有良好至优秀的有效性和检查者内可靠性,但检查者间可靠性仅为一般至良好。本研究中最有效的髋关节旋转位置是仰卧位内旋角度测量,而有效性最低的是坐位外旋角度测量。智能手机应用程序是髋关节旋转角度的实用测量方法之一。

试验注册

泰国临床试验注册中心编号20181022003(http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th),于2018年10月18日15:30:29进行回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c84/7879637/cd3ef31db559/12891_2021_3995_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验