Charlton Paula C, Mentiplay Benjamin F, Pua Yong-Hao, Clark Ross A
School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 May;18(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
Traditional methods of assessing joint range of motion (ROM) involve specialized tools that may not be widely available to clinicians. This study assesses the reliability and validity of a custom Smartphone application for assessing hip joint range of motion.
Intra-tester reliability with concurrent validity.
Passive hip joint range of motion was recorded for seven different movements in 20 males on two separate occasions. Data from a Smartphone, bubble inclinometer and a three dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) system were collected simultaneously. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficients of variation (CV) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used to assess reliability. To assess validity of the Smartphone application and the bubble inclinometer against the three dimensional motion analysis system, intraclass correlation coefficients and fixed and proportional biases were used.
The Smartphone demonstrated good to excellent reliability (ICCs>0.75) for four out of the seven movements, and moderate to good reliability for the remaining three movements (ICC=0.63-0.68). Additionally, the Smartphone application displayed comparable reliability to the bubble inclinometer. The Smartphone application displayed excellent validity when compared to the three dimensional motion analysis system for all movements (ICCs>0.88) except one, which displayed moderate to good validity (ICC=0.71).
Smartphones are portable and widely available tools that are mostly reliable and valid for assessing passive hip range of motion, with potential for large-scale use when a bubble inclinometer is not available. However, caution must be taken in its implementation as some movement axes demonstrated only moderate reliability.
评估关节活动范围(ROM)的传统方法需要使用专业工具,临床医生可能无法广泛获取。本研究评估一款定制智能手机应用程序评估髋关节活动范围的可靠性和有效性。
测试者内可靠性及同时效度。
对20名男性进行两次独立测量,记录七个不同动作时的被动髋关节活动范围。同时收集智能手机、气泡倾斜仪和三维运动分析(3DMA)系统的数据。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、变异系数(CV)和测量标准误差(SEM)评估可靠性。为评估智能手机应用程序和气泡倾斜仪相对于三维运动分析系统的效度,使用组内相关系数以及固定偏差和比例偏差。
智能手机在七个动作中的四个动作上显示出良好至优秀的可靠性(ICC>0.75),其余三个动作显示出中等至良好的可靠性(ICC = 0.63 - 0.68)。此外,智能手机应用程序与气泡倾斜仪显示出相当的可靠性。与三维运动分析系统相比,除了一个动作显示出中等至良好的效度(ICC = 0.71)外,智能手机应用程序在所有动作上均显示出优秀的效度(ICC>0.88)。
智能手机是便于携带且广泛可用的工具,在评估被动髋关节活动范围方面大多可靠且有效,在没有气泡倾斜仪的情况下有大规模使用的潜力。然而,在应用时必须谨慎,因为一些运动轴仅显示出中等的可靠性。