Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;77(8):1181-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03104-1. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
The recent repurposing of ketamine as treatment for pain and depression has increased the need for accurate population pharmacokinetic (PK) models to inform the design of new clinical trials. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to externally validate available PK models on (S)-(nor)ketamine concentrations with in-house data and to improve the best performing model when necessary.
Based on predefined criteria, five models were selected from literature. Data of two previously performed clinical trials on (S)-ketamine administration in healthy volunteers were available for validation. The predictive performances of the selected models were compared through visual predictive checks (VPCs) and calculation of the (root) mean (square) prediction errors (ME and RMSE). The available data was used to adapt the best performing model through alterations to the model structure and re-estimation of inter-individual variability (IIV).
The model developed by Fanta et al. (Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71:441-447, 2015) performed best at predicting the (S)-ketamine concentration over time, but failed to capture the (S)-norketamine C correctly. Other models with similar population demographics and study designs had estimated relatively small distribution volumes of (S)-ketamine and thus overpredicted concentrations after start of infusion, most likely due to the influence of circulatory dynamics and sampling methodology. Model predictions were improved through a reduction in complexity of the (S)-(nor)ketamine model and re-estimation of IIV.
The modified model resulted in accurate predictions of both (S)-ketamine and (S)-norketamine and thereby provides a solid foundation for future simulation studies of (S)-(nor)ketamine PK in healthy volunteers after (S)-ketamine infusion.
氯胺酮最近被重新用于治疗疼痛和抑郁症,这增加了对准确的群体药代动力学(PK)模型的需求,以为新的临床试验设计提供信息。因此,本研究的目的是使用内部数据对外科(S)-去甲氯胺酮浓度的现有 PK 模型进行验证,并在必要时改进表现最佳的模型。
根据预设标准,从文献中选择了五个模型。有两个先前在健康志愿者中进行的(S)-氯胺酮给药临床试验的数据可用于验证。通过可视化预测检查(VPC)和计算(根)均方预测误差(ME 和 RMSE)比较所选模型的预测性能。利用可用数据,通过改变模型结构和重新估算个体间变异(IIV)来调整表现最佳的模型。
Fanta 等人开发的模型(Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71:441-447, 2015)在预测(S)-氯胺酮随时间的浓度方面表现最佳,但未能正确捕获(S)-去甲氯胺酮 C。其他具有相似人群特征和研究设计的模型估计的(S)-氯胺酮分布体积相对较小,因此在输注开始后过度预测浓度,这很可能是由于循环动力学和采样方法的影响。通过简化(S)-(nor)氯胺酮模型和重新估算 IIV,模型预测得到了改善。
改进后的模型对(S)-氯胺酮和(S)-去甲氯胺酮的预测均准确,为(S)-氯胺酮输注后健康志愿者中(S)-(nor)氯胺酮 PK 的未来模拟研究提供了坚实的基础。