Rashidifard Christopher, Boudreau John, Revak Thomas
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Dec 1;34(12):650-655. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001879.
Compare intraoperative "on end" fluoroscopy lag screw position to postoperative computer tomography.
Retrospective review.
Level 1 trauma center.
One hundred sixteen patients sustaining operative acetabular fractures with posterior wall components.
Posterior wall lag screws placed using "on end" fluoroscopic imaging.
The primary outcome was determining correlation between lag screw position, in relation to the acetabular articular margin, using intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative computer tomography. Analysis was performed based on location around the acetabulum, including posterior (P), superoposterior (SP), and superior (S) regions, and screws 0-5, 5-10, and >10 mm from the joint.
Two hundred forty-four lag screws were identified as follows: 51.6% in the P group, 25.4% in SP, and 23.0% in the S group with excellent correlation noted in all groups. For screws pooled based on fluoroscopic distance from the joint, 28.3% were 0-5 mm, 52.9% 5.01-10 mm, and 18.4% >10 mm. Correlation coefficients were 0.60 for 0-5 mm and 0.68 for both groups >5 mm. Subdividing screws based on anatomic region and fluoroscopic location found increasing correlation as screws moved further from the joint in the P region. In the SP group, excellent correlation was noted for screws 0-5 mm with decreasing correlation further from the joint. Within the S group, correlation for screws 0-5 mm did not reach significance, but good correlation was noted for screws >5 mm. Overall incidence of intraarticular screws was 1.2%.
Intraoperative axial fluoroscopy for posterior wall lag screw placement correlates closely with postoperative computer tomography allowing for reliable posterior wall lag screw placement in all regions around the acetabulum. Care should be taken while placing lag screws within 5 mm of the articular surface, particularly within the posterior region.
比较术中“端对端”透视下拉力螺钉位置与术后计算机断层扫描结果。
回顾性研究。
一级创伤中心。
116例接受手术治疗的髋臼后壁骨折患者。
采用“端对端”透视成像置入后壁拉力螺钉。
主要观察指标是通过术中透视和术后计算机断层扫描确定拉力螺钉位置与髋臼关节边缘的相关性。根据髋臼周围位置进行分析,包括后部(P)、后上部(SP)和上部(S)区域,以及距关节0 - 5毫米、5 - 10毫米和大于10毫米的螺钉。
共识别出244枚拉力螺钉,其中P组占51.6%,SP组占25.4%,S组占23.0%,所有组均显示出良好的相关性。根据透视下距关节的距离汇总螺钉,28.3%为0 - 5毫米,52.9%为5.01 - 10毫米,18.4%大于10毫米。0 - 5毫米组的相关系数为0.60,大于5毫米的两组相关系数为0.68。根据解剖区域和透视位置细分螺钉发现,在P区域,随着螺钉离关节越远,相关性增加。在SP组,0 - 5毫米的螺钉相关性良好,离关节越远相关性降低。在S组,0 - 5毫米的螺钉相关性无统计学意义,但大于5毫米的螺钉相关性良好。关节内螺钉的总体发生率为1.2%。
术中轴向透视下置入后壁拉力螺钉与术后计算机断层扫描密切相关,可在髋臼周围所有区域可靠地置入后壁拉力螺钉。在关节面5毫米范围内置入拉力螺钉时应谨慎,尤其是在后部区域。